A Breast Cancer Nomogram for Prediction of Non-Sentinel Node Metastasis - Validation of Fourteen Existing Models

被引:26
作者
Koca, Bulent [1 ]
Kuru, Bekir [2 ]
Ozen, Necati
Yoruker, Savas
Bek, Yuksel [3 ]
机构
[1] Korgan Devlet Hastanesi, Ordu, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
Breast cancer nomogram; non-sentinel node metastasis; nomogram for non-SLN metastasis; NONSENTINEL LYMPH-NODE; AXILLARY DISSECTION; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; ONLINE CALCULATOR; INVOLVEMENT; LIKELIHOOD; BIOPSY; RISK; LIMITATIONS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1481
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To avoid performing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for non-sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients with-SLN positive axilla, nomograms for predicting the status have been developed in many centers. We created a new nomogram predicting non-SLN metastasis in SLN-positive patients with invasive breast cancer and evaluated 14 existing breast cancer models in our patient group. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and thirty seven invasive breast cancer patients with SLN metastases who underwent ALND were included in the study. Based on independent predictive factors for non-SLN metastasis identified by logistic regression analysis, we developed a new nomogram. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the models were created and the areas under the curves (AUC) were computed. Results: In a multivariate analysis, tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion, extranodal extension of SLN, large size of metastatic SLN, the number of negative SLNs, and multifocality were found to be independent predictive factors for non-SLN metastasis. The AUC was found to be 0.87, and calibration was good for the present Ondokuz Mayis nomogram. Among the 14 validated models, the MSKCC, Stanford, Turkish, MD Anderson, MOU (Masaryk), Ljubljana, and DEU models yielded excellent AUC values of >0.80. Conclusions: We present a new model to predict the likelihood of non-SLN metastasis. Each clinic should determine and use the most suitable nomogram or should create their own nomograms for the prediction of non-SLN metastasis.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1488
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy [J].
Alran, Severine ;
De Rycke, Yann ;
Fourchotte, Virginie ;
Charitansky, Helene ;
Laki, Fatima ;
Falcou, Marie Christine ;
Benamor, Myriam ;
Frencaux, Paul ;
Salmon, Remy Jacques ;
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (08) :2195-2201
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Cengage Learning
[3]   Axilla scoring systems predicting risk of non-sentinel-node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node [J].
Barranger, Emmanuel ;
Morel, Olivier ;
Coutant, Charles .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (04) :1261-1262
[4]   Prediction of sentinel lymph node-only disease in women with invasive breast cancer [J].
Chagpar, Anees B. ;
Scoggins, Charles R. ;
Martin, Robert C. G., II ;
Carlson, David J. ;
Laidley, Alison L. ;
El-Eid, Souzan E. ;
McGlothin, Terre Q. ;
McMasters, Kelly M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 192 (06) :882-886
[5]   Validation and comparison of models to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Zhu, Liling ;
Jia, Weijuan ;
Rao, Nanyan ;
Fan, Miaojing ;
Huang, Hui ;
Shan, Quanyuan ;
Han, Jingjing ;
Song, Erwei ;
Zeng, Yunjie ;
Su, Fengxi .
CANCER SCIENCE, 2012, 103 (02) :274-281
[6]   A scoring system to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: A comparison with other scoring systems [J].
Cho, Jihyoung ;
Han, Wonshik ;
Lee, Jong Won ;
Ko, Eunyoung ;
Kang, So Young ;
Jung, So-Youn ;
Kim, Eun-Kyu ;
Moon, Woo Kyung ;
Cho, Nariya ;
Park, In-Ae ;
Chung, Jun-Key ;
Hwang, Ki-Tae ;
Kim, Sung-Won ;
Noh, Dong-Young .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (08) :2278-2286
[7]   Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status After Positive Sentinel Biopsy in Breast Cancer: What Model Performs the Best in a Czech Population? [J].
Coufal, Oldrich ;
Pavlik, Tomas ;
Fabian, Pavel ;
Bori, Rita ;
Boross, Gabor ;
Sejben, Istvan ;
Maraz, Robert ;
Koca, Jaroslav ;
Krejci, Eva ;
Horakova, Iva ;
Foltinova, Vendula ;
Vrtelova, Pavlina ;
Chrenko, Vojtech ;
Tekle, Wolde Eliza ;
Rajtar, Maria ;
Svebis, Mihaly ;
Fait, Vuk ;
Cserni, Gabor .
PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (04) :733-740
[8]   Comparison of Models to Predict Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Prospective Multicenter Study [J].
Coutant, Charles ;
Olivier, Camille ;
Lambaudie, Eric ;
Fondrinier, Eric ;
Marchal, Frederic ;
Guillemin, Francois ;
Seince, Nathalie ;
Thomas, Veronique ;
Leveque, Jean ;
Barranger, Emmanuel ;
Darai, Emile ;
Uzan, Serge ;
Houvenaeghel, Gilles ;
Rouzier, Roman .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (17) :2800-2808
[9]   Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study [J].
Coutant, Charles ;
Rouzier, Roman ;
Fondrinier, Eric ;
Marchal, Frederic ;
Guillemin, Francois ;
Seince, Nathalie ;
Rodrigues, Anabella ;
Darai, Emile ;
Uzan, Serge ;
Barranger, Emmanuel .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 113 (03) :537-543
[10]   Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram [J].
Degnim, AC ;
Reynolds, C ;
Pantvaidya, G ;
Zakaria, S ;
Hoskin, T ;
Barnes, S ;
Roberts, MV ;
Lucas, PC ;
Oh, K ;
Koker, M ;
Sabel, MS ;
Newman, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (04) :543-550