Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in diabetic patients with an acute coronary syndrome

被引:55
|
作者
Laine, Marc [1 ]
Frere, Corinne [5 ]
Toesca, Richard [2 ]
Berbis, Julie [3 ,4 ]
Barnay, Pierre [6 ]
Pansieri, Michel [6 ]
Michelet, Pierre [2 ]
Bessereau, Jacques
Camilleri, Elise [7 ]
Ronsin, Olivia [8 ]
Helal, Olfa [1 ]
Paganelli, Franck [1 ]
Dignat-George, Francoise [5 ]
Bonello, Laurent [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Nord, Assistance Publ Hop Marseille, Dept Cardiol, F-13015 Marseille, France
[2] Hop Enfants La Timone, Pole RUSH, Marseille, France
[3] Unite Rech EA 3279, Marseille, France
[4] Dept Sante Publ, Marseille, France
[5] Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM UMRS 1076, Fac Pharm, Marseille, France
[6] Hop Avignon, Serv Cardiol, Avignon, France
[7] Hop Marguerite, Serv Cardiol, Marseille, France
[8] Hop Univ Nord, Assistance Publ Hop Marseille, Serv Endocrinol, F-13015 Marseille, France
关键词
VASP index; P2Y12 receptor blockade; acute coronary syndrome; diabetes mellitus; percutaneous coronary intervention; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; PLATELET INHIBITION; CLOPIDOGREL TREATMENT; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; ACTIVE METABOLITE; VS; CLOPIDOGREL; ARTERY-DISEASE; INTERVENTION; REACTIVITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1160/TH13-05-0384
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Optimal P2Y12 receptor blockade is critical to prevent ischaemic recurrence in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the level of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition achieved by prasugrel and ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in diabetic acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI. We performed a single-center prospective open-label randomised trial. Patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing PCI for an ACS were randomised to receive prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg. The primary endpoint of the study was the level of platelet reactivity (PR) assessed between 6 and 18 hours post-LD using the VASP index. We randomised 100 diabetic patients undergoing PCI for an ACS. No difference was observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. In particular, the rate of patient receiving insulin therapy was identical (25 vs 28.6%; p=0.7). Ticagrelor achieved a significantly lower PR compared to prasugrel loading dose (17.3 +/- 14.2 vs 27.7 +/- 23.3%; p=0.009). In addition the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, defined by a VASP >= 50%, tend to be lower in the ticagrelor group although the difference did not reach statistical significance (6 vs 16%; p=0.2). The rate of low on treatment PR was identical (60 vs 54%; p=0.8). The present study demonstrates that ticagrelor LD is superior to prasugrel LD to reduce PR in ACS patients with diabetes mellitus. Whether the higher potency of ticagrelor could translate into a clinical benefit should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ticagrelor or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome
    Vaux, J.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE, 2020, 10 (06): : 414 - 415
  • [2] Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome: a randomized comparison
    Deharo, P.
    Bassez, C.
    Bonnet, G.
    Pankert, M.
    Quilci, J.
    Alessi, M. C.
    Bonnet, J. L.
    Cuisset, T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 1160 - 1160
  • [3] Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome: A randomized comparison
    Deharo, Pierre
    Bassez, Clemence
    Bonnet, Guillaume
    Pankert, Mathieu
    Quilici, Jacques
    Lambert, Marc
    Verdier, Valentine
    Morange, Pierre
    Alessi, Marie-Christine
    Bonnet, Jean-Louis
    Cuisset, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 170 (02) : E21 - E22
  • [4] Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An unresolved issue
    Savarese, Gianluigi
    Lund, Lars H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 249 : 77 - 78
  • [5] Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shah, Rajendra P.
    Shafiq, Aimen
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Maniya, Muhammad Talha
    Duhan, Sanchit
    Keisham, Bijeta
    Patel, Bansari
    Alamzaib, Sardar Muhammad
    Yashi, Kanica
    Uppal, Dipan
    Sattar, Yasar
    Tiwari, Dinesh
    Paul, Timir K.
    AlJaroudi, Wael
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 207 : 206 - 214
  • [6] Comparative effectiveness of prasugrel versus ticagrelor for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with acute coronary syndrome
    Dawwas, Ghadeer
    Dietrich, Eric
    Winchester, David E.
    Winterstein, Almut G.
    Segal, Richard
    Park, Haesuk
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 364 - 364
  • [7] Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior myocardial infarction
    Scalamogna, M.
    Lahu, S.
    Ndrepepa, G.
    Mayer, K.
    Gewalt, S.
    Menichelli, M.
    Bernlochner, I.
    Joner, M.
    Xhepa, E.
    Kufner, S.
    Laugwitz, K. L.
    Neumann, F. J.
    Schunkert, H.
    Kastrati, A.
    Cassese, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 1400 - 1400
  • [8] Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk
    Lahu, S.
    Presch, A.
    Ndrepepa, G.
    Bernlochner, I.
    Joner, M.
    Xhepa, E.
    Kufner, S.
    Sager, H. B.
    Mayer, K.
    Kessler, T.
    Laugwitz, K. L.
    Schunkert, H.
    Neumann, F. J.
    Kastrati, A.
    Cassese, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 1384 - 1384
  • [9] Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey
    Eliaz, Ran
    Mengesha, Bethlehem
    Ovdat, Tal
    Iakobishvili, Zaza
    Hasdai, David
    Kheifets, Mark
    Klempfner, Robert
    Beigel, Roy
    Kalmanovich, Eran
    Alcalai, Ronny
    Levi, Amos
    CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 147 (02) : 113 - 120
  • [10] Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
    Schuepke, S.
    Neumann, F. -J
    Menichelli, M.
    Mayer, K.
    Bernlochner, I.
    Woehrle, J.
    Richardt, G.
    Liebetrau, C.
    Witzenbichler, B.
    Antoniucci, D.
    Akin, I.
    Bott-Fluegel, L.
    Fischer, M.
    Landmesser, U.
    Katus, H. A.
    Sibbing, D.
    Seyfarth, M.
    Janisch, M.
    Boncompagni, D.
    Hilz, R.
    Rottbauer, W.
    Okrojek, R.
    Moellmann, H.
    Hochholzer, W.
    Migliorini, A.
    Cassese, S.
    Mollo, P.
    Xhepa, E.
    Kufner, S.
    Strehle, A.
    Leggewie, S.
    Allali, A.
    Ndrepepa, G.
    Schuehlen, H.
    Angiolillo, D. J.
    Hamm, C. W.
    Hapfelmeier, A.
    Toelg, R.
    Trenk, D.
    Schunkert, H.
    Laugwitz, K. -L
    Kastrati, A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (16): : 1524 - 1534