Diffusion-weighted MRI, 11C-choline PET and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for predicting the Gleason score in prostate carcinoma

被引:13
作者
Chang, Joe H. [1 ,5 ]
Joon, Daryl Lim [1 ]
Lee, Sze Ting [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Hiew, Chee-Yan [3 ]
Esler, Stephen [3 ]
Gong, Sylvia J. [2 ]
Wada, Morikatsu [1 ]
Clouston, David [7 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [8 ]
Goh, Yin P. [9 ]
Tochon-Danguy, Henri [2 ]
Chan, J. Gordon [2 ]
Bolton, Damien [4 ,5 ]
Scott, Andrew M. [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Khoo, Vincent [1 ,5 ,11 ,12 ]
Davis, Ian D. [10 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Radiat Oncol Ctr, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Austin Hlth, Ctr PET, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin Hlth, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[4] Austin Hlth, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[6] Ludwig Inst Canc Res, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[7] Tissupath, Mt Waverley, Vic, Australia
[8] Epworth Med Fdn, Richmond, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Hlth, Diagnost Imaging, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[10] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Box Hill, Vic 3128, Australia
[11] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Clin Oncol, London, England
[12] Inst Canc Res, London SW3 6JB, England
关键词
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Positron-emission tomography; Prostate cancer; Gleason grading; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; SCANS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-013-3045-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy, diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), C-11-choline (CHOL) positron emission tomography (PET), and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in predicting the prostatectomy Gleason risk (GR). Methods The study included 21 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy and multi-technique imaging before radical prostatectomy. Values from five different tests (TRUS biopsy, DW MRI, CHOL PET, FDG PET, and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET) were correlated with the prostatectomy GR using Spearman's rho. Tests that were found to have significant correlations were used to classify patients into GR groups. Results The following tests had significant correlations with prostatectomy GR: TRUS biopsy (rho = 0.617, P = 0.003), DW MRI (rho = -0.601, P = 0.004), and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET (rho = -0.623, P = 0.003). CHOL PET alone and FDG PET only had weak correlations. The correct GR classification rates were 67 % with TRUS biopsy, 67 % with DW MRI, and 76 % with combined DW MRI/CHOL PET. Conclusions DW MRI and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET have significant correlations and high rates of correct classification of the prostatectomy GR, the strength and accuracy of which are comparable with TRUS biopsy. Key Points Accurate determination of the Gleason score is essential for prostate cancer management. DW MRI +/- CHOL PET correlated significantly with prostatectomy Gleason score. These correlations are similar to that between TRUS biopsy and prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 722
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] GLEASON DONALD F., 1966, CANCER CHEMO THERAP REP, V50, P125
  • [13] Heidenreich A, 2011, GUID PROST CANC
  • [14] Histological variants of prostatic carcinoma and their significance
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 60 (01) : 59 - 74
  • [15] FDG PET in Prostate Cancer
    Jadvar, Hossein
    [J]. PET CLINICS, 2009, 4 (02) : 155 - +
  • [16] Infectious Complications and Hospital Admissions After Prostate Biopsy in a European Randomized Trial
    Loeb, Stacy
    van den Heuvel, Suzanne
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (06) : 1110 - 1114
  • [17] Mohler J, 2010, J NATL COMPR CANC NE, V8, P162, DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012
  • [18] Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Quantitative MR Parameters With Gleason Score and Tumor Angiogenesis
    Oto, Aytekin
    Yang, Cheng
    Kayhan, Arda
    Tretiakova, Maria
    Antic, Tatjana
    Schmid-Tannwald, Christine
    Eggener, Scott
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Stadler, Walter M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) : 1382 - 1390
  • [19] Prostate Cancer: Differentiation of Central Gland Cancer from Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Using Diffusion-weighted and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Oto, Aytekin
    Kayhan, Arda
    Jiang, Yulei
    Tretiakova, Maria
    Yang, Cheng
    Antic, Tatjana
    Dahi, Farid
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Karczmar, Gregory
    Stadler, Walter M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (03) : 715 - 723
  • [20] Introducing Parametric Fusion PET/MRI of Primary Prostate Cancer
    Park, Hyunjin
    Wood, David
    Hussain, Hero
    Meyer, Charles R.
    Shah, Rajal B.
    Johnson, Timothy D.
    Chenevert, Thomas
    Piert, Morand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (04) : 546 - 551