Is it an animal?: Is it a human face?: Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes

被引:169
作者
Rousselet, GA [1 ]
Macé, MJM [1 ]
Fabre-Thorpe, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Rech Cerveau & Cognit, CNRS UPS UMR 5549, Toulouse, France
关键词
rapid visual categorization; human performance; natural scenes; human faces; animals and animal faces; inversion effect; mental rotation; configural processing;
D O I
10.1167/3.6.5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Object categorization can be extremely fast. But among all objects, human faces might hold a special status that could depend on a specialized module. Visual processing could thus be faster for faces than for any other kind of object. Moreover, because face processing might rely on facial configuration, it could be more disrupted by stimulus inversion. Here we report two experiments that compared the rapid categorization of human faces and animals or animal faces in the context of upright and inverted natural scenes. In Experiment 1, the natural scenes contained human faces and animals in a full range of scales from close-up to far views. In Experiment 2, targets were restricted to close-ups of human faces and animal faces. Both experiments revealed the remarkable object processing efficiency of our visual system and further showed (1) virtually no advantage for faces over animals; (2) very little performance impairment with inversion; and (3) greater sensitivity of faces to inversion. These results are interpreted within the framework of a unique system for object processing in the ventral pathway. In this system, evidence would accumulate very quickly and efficiently to categorize visual objects, without involving a face module or a mental rotation mechanism. It is further suggested that rapid object categorization in natural scenes might not rely on high-level features but rather on features of intermediate complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 455
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Effect of image orientation and size on object recognition: Responses of single units in the macaque monkey temporal cortex [J].
Ashbridge, E ;
Perrett, DI ;
Oram, MW ;
Jellema, T .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) :13-34
[2]   Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J].
Bentin, S ;
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
Perez, E ;
McCarthy, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :551-565
[3]   Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces [J].
Carmel, D ;
Bentin, S .
COGNITION, 2002, 83 (01) :1-29
[4]   Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search [J].
Chelazzi, L ;
Duncan, J ;
Miller, EK ;
Desimone, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 80 (06) :2918-2940
[5]   ERPs and chronometry of face recognition: following-up Seeck et al. and George et al. [J].
Debruille, JB ;
Guillem, F ;
Renault, B .
NEUROREPORT, 1998, 9 (15) :3349-3353
[6]   Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework [J].
Dehaene, S ;
Naccache, L .
COGNITION, 2001, 79 (1-2) :1-37
[7]  
DELORME A, 2003, UNPUB INTERACTION TO
[8]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117
[10]   A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes [J].
Fabre-Thorpe, M ;
Delorme, A ;
Marlot, C ;
Thorpe, S .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (02) :171-180