Numerical analysis on the power consumption of the PSA process for recovering CO2 from flue gas

被引:97
作者
Park, JH [1 ]
Beum, HT [1 ]
Kim, JN [1 ]
Cho, SH [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Energy Res, Yusungku, Taejon 305343, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie010716i
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
To recover 99% CO2 from flue gas containing 10-15% CO2, a two-stage pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process is usually employed. At the first stage of the two-stage PSA, CO2 is concentrated to 40-60% and then concentrated to 99% at the second stage. Because two stages are coupled with each other, the overall optimization of the two-stage PSA process is quite a complicated task. In this paper, we only considered the first stage of the two-stage PSA process to simplify the analysis. Effects of the process configuration and operating variables such as the P/F ratio and desorption pressure on the specific power consumption were investigated. The specific power consumption at the blower was reduced with the increase of the P/F ratio. On the contrary, that at the vacuum pump was increased with the increase of the P/F ratio. Because of these two effects, there was an optimum PIF ratio, which minimized the specific power consumption. While the compression ratio is reduced with the increase of the desorption pressure, the CO2 purity is decreased and the amount of the power used to compress nitrogen is increased. As a result, the specific power consumption was insensitive to the desorption pressure within the range studied here. Employing the pressure equalization step, the CO2 purity could be increased without much increase of the specific power consumption. With the rinse step, which is often used to increase the purity of the strongly adsorbed component, the CO2 purity could be increased. However, because more gases should be pumped to produce a given amount of CO2, the specific power consumption was significantly increased at a given recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:4122 / 4131
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Kinetic analysis of CO2 recovery from flue gas by an ecotechnological system [J].
Tabata, M ;
Chohji, T ;
Hirai, E .
ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL CONVERSIONS FOR MITIGATING CARBON DIOXIDE, 1998, 114 :673-676
[32]   APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL ABSORPTION PROCESS TO CO2 RECOVERY FROM FLUE-GAS GENERATED IN POWER-PLANTS [J].
YAGI, T ;
SHIBUYA, H ;
SASAKI, T .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1992, 33 (5-8) :349-355
[33]   Consideration for H2O-PSA placed in front of system of CO2 separation from flue gas [J].
Saji, A ;
Takamura, Y ;
Noda, H ;
Watanabe, F ;
Matsuda, H ;
Hasatani, M .
KAGAKU KOGAKU RONBUNSHU, 1997, 23 (04) :477-481
[34]   Energy consumption and economic analysis of CO2 2 capture from flue gas by membrane separation coupled with hydrate method [J].
Xiao, Yang ;
Li, Ai-Rong ;
Li, Bin ;
Li, Minchang ;
Yao, Hao ;
Wang, Zhihong .
ENERGY, 2024, 312
[35]   ANALYSIS OF CO2 CAPTURE FROM POWER-PLANT FLUE GAS USING THE MEMBRANE GAS ABSORPTION (MGA) METHOD [J].
Zhang, Zhien ;
Yan, Yunfei ;
Wang, Junlei ;
Zhang, Li ;
Chen, Yanrong ;
Ju, Shunxiang .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME POWER CONFERENCE, 2015, 2016,
[36]   Design of an efficient CO2 methanation process and techno-economic analysis with CO2 capture from the flue gas of automotive shredder residue [J].
Wasnik, Chopendra G. ;
Nakamura, Maki ;
Machida, Hiroshi ;
Ito, Junji ;
Shiratori, Kazuyuki ;
Norinaga, Koyo .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 507
[37]   Separation of CO2 from power plant flue gas using a novel CO2 "molecular basket" adsorbent. [J].
Xu, XC ;
Song, CS ;
Wincek, RT ;
Andresen, JA ;
Miller, BG ;
Scaroni, AW .
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 :U854-U855
[38]   Chitosan for separation and capture of CO2 from flue gas [J].
Levitskaia, Tatiana G. ;
Casella, Amanda J. ;
Peterson, James M. .
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 239
[39]   CO2 CAN BE PRODUCED FROM FLUE-GAS [J].
ARNOLD, DS ;
BARRETT, DA ;
ISOM, RH .
OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1982, 80 (47) :130-&
[40]   Process simulation and evaluation of CO2 removal from flue gas by binary compound solutions [J].
Fang, Tongbo ;
Zhao, Bingtao ;
Wang, Daqi ;
Su, Yaxin .
Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38 (03) :1561-1566