Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches

被引:61
作者
Lucas, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
Freeberg, Todd M.
Long, Glenis R.
Krishnan, Ananthanarayan
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Lilly Hall Life Sci, Dept Sci Biol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Psychol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[4] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Speech & Hearing Sci Program, New York, NY 10016 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY | 2007年 / 193卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
auditory evoked response (AER); frequency following response (FFR); seasonality; bird hearing; vocal complexity;
D O I
10.1007/s00359-006-0180-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We tested for seasonal plasticity of the peripheral auditory system of three North American members of the Sylvioidea: Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis). We measured three classes of auditory evoked responses (AER) to tone stimuli: sustained receptor/neural responses to pure-tone condensation waveforms, the frequency-following response (FFR), and the earliest peak of the AER to stimulus onset (tone onset response). Seasonal changes were detected in all classes of AERs in chickadees and nuthatches. Seasonal changes in titmice were restricted to the tone onset response. Interestingly, changes detected in chickadees (and to a lesser extent in titmice) were generally in an opposite direction to changes seen in nuthatches, with chickadees exhibiting greater amplitude AER responses in the spring than in winter, and nuthatches exhibiting greater amplitude AER responses in winter than in spring. In addition, the seasonal differences in the sustained responses tended to be broad-band in the chickadees but restricted to a narrower frequency range in nuthatches. In contrast, seasonal differences in the onset response were over a broader frequency range in titmice than in chickadees and nuthatches. We discuss some possible mechanistic and functional explanations for these seasonal changes.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 215
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMP HEARING BIRDS R
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATI
[3]  
Ball GF, 1999, DESIGN OF ANIMAL COMMUNICATION, P213
[4]   Neuroendocrinology of song behavior and avian brain plasticity: Multiple sites of action of sex steroid hormones [J].
Ball, GF ;
Riters, LV ;
Balthazart, J .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2002, 23 (02) :137-178
[5]   Note types and coding in parid vocalizations.: III:: The chick-a-dee call of the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) [J].
Bloomfield, LL ;
Phillmore, LS ;
Weisman, RG ;
Sturdy, CB .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2005, 83 (06) :820-833
[6]  
Bottjer SW, 1997, J NEUROBIOL, V33, P602, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<602::AID-NEU8>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-8
[8]   Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges [J].
Brenowitz, EA ;
Beecher, MD .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2005, 28 (03) :127-132
[9]   Plasticity of the adult avian song control system [J].
Brenowitz, EA .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROBIOLOGY OF BIRDSONG, 2004, 1016 :560-585
[10]   Auditory brainstem responses in the Eastern Screech Owl: An estimate of auditory thresholds [J].
Brittan-Powell, EF ;
Lohr, B ;
Hahn, DC ;
Dooling, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (01) :314-321