CHARACTERIZATIONS OF CENTRAL SYMMETRY FOR CONVEX BODIES IN MINKOWSKI SPACES

被引:5
作者
Averkov, Gennadiy [1 ]
Makai, Endre, Jr. [2 ]
Martini, Horst [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Fac Math, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, A Renyi Inst Math, H-1364 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Antipodality; Busemann definition of surface area; central symmetry; convex body; Holmes-Thompson definition of surface area; hemispherical transformation; illumination; Minkowski space; (Minkowskian) surface area measure; normed linear space; (sharp) shadow boundary; spherical harmonics; INTEGRAL-EQUATION; EUCLIDEAN-SPACE; SPHERE; SETS;
D O I
10.1556/SScMath.2009.1104
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
K. Zindler [47] and P.C. Hammer and T.J. Smith [19] showed the following: Let K be a convex body in the Euclidean plane such that any two boundary points p and q of K, that divide the circumference of K into two arcs of equal length, are antipodal. Then K is centrally symmetric. [19] announced the analogous result for any Minkowski plane M(2), with arc length measured in the respective Minkowski metric. This was recently proved by Y.D. Chai-Y.I. Kim [7] and G.Averkov [4]. On the other hand, for Euclide and-space R(d), R. Schneider [38] proved that if K subset of R(d) is a convex body, such that each shadow boundary of K with respect to parallel illumination halves the Euclidean surface area of K (for the definition of "halving" see in the paper), then K is centrally symmetric. (This implies the result from [19] for R(2).) We give a common generalization of the results of Schneider [38] and Averkov [4]. Namely, let M(d) be a d-dimensional Minkowski space, and K subset of M(d) be a convex body. If some Minkowskian surface area (e.g., Busemann's or Holmes-Thompson's) of K is halved by each shadow boundary of K with respect to parallel illumination, then K is centrally symmetric. Actually, we use little from the definition of Minkowskian surface area (s). We may measure "surface area" via any even Borel function phi: S(d-1) -> R, for a convex body K with Euclidean surface area measure dS(K)(u), with phi(u) being dS(K)(u)-almost everywhere non-0, by the formula B bar right arrow integral(B) phi(u)dS(K)(u) (supposing that phi is integrable with respect to dS(K)(u)), for B subset of S(d-1) a Borel set, rather than the Euclidean surface area measure B bar right arrow integral(B) dS(K)(u). The conclusion remains the same, even if we suppose surface area halving only for parallel illumination from almost all directions. Moreover, replacing the surface area measure dS(K)(u) by the k-th area measure of K (k with 1 <= k <= d - 2 an integer), the analogous result holds. We follow rather closely the proof for R(d), which is due to Schneider [38].
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 514
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Alexandrov Alexander D., 1937, Selected works, V2, P1205
  • [2] Andrews G.E., 1999, Encycl. Math. Appl., V71
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1966, LECT NOTES MATH
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1995, ENCY MATH ITS APPL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1953, Higher transcendental functions
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1917, Mathematische Annalen, DOI 10.1007/BF01457114
  • [7] Auerbach H., 1938, Studia Math, V7, P121, DOI DOI 10.4064/SM-7-1-121-142
  • [8] Averkov G., 2006, BEITRAGE ALGEBRA GEO, V47, P489
  • [9] BLASCHKE W., 1956, Kreis und Kugel, V2ed
  • [10] The stability of the Rogers-Shephard inequality and of some related inqualities
    Böröczky, K
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS, 2005, 190 (01) : 47 - 76