Conization and lymph node evaluation as a fertility-sparing treatment for early stage cervical cancer

被引:16
作者
Martinelli, Fabio [1 ]
Ditto, Antonino [1 ]
Filippi, Francesca [2 ]
Vinti, Daniele [3 ]
Bogani, Giorgio [1 ]
Leone Roberti Maggiore, Umberto [1 ]
Evangelista, Mariateresa [1 ]
Signorelli, Mauro [1 ]
Chiappa, Valentina [1 ]
Lopez, Salvatore [1 ]
Somigliana, Edgardo [2 ,4 ]
Raspagliesi, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Gynecol Oncol, Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Infertil Unit, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
[3] ASST Rhodense, Obstet & Gynecol, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
关键词
cervical cancer; surgical procedures; operative; gynecology; SLN and lympadenectomy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; RADICAL-TRACHELECTOMY; STANDARD; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2020-001740
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction To evaluate oncological and obstetrical outcomes of early stage cervical cancer patients who underwent conservative management to retain childbearing potential. Methods Data of women (aged <40 years) who underwent fertility sparing treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion (LVSI) and IB1 cervical cancer were prospectively collected. All patients underwent cervical conization/s and laparoscopic nodal evaluation (pelvic lymphadenectomy/sentinel node mapping). Oncological and obstetrical outcomes were assessed. Results Overall, 39 patients met inclusion criteria; 36 (92.3%) women were nulliparous. There were: 3 (7.7%) IA1-LVSI+; 11 (28.2%) IA2; and 25 (64.1%) IB1 cervical cancers, according to 2018 FIGO stage classification. Histological types were 22 (56.4%) squamous carcinoma and 17 (43.6%) adenocarcinoma. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 29 (74.4%) patients, while 10 (25.6%) patients had only sentinel node mapping. In 4 (10.3%) patients conservative treatment was discontinued due to nodal involvement and 2 (5.1%) patients requested definitive treatment (hysterectomy) after a negative lymph node evaluation. Among 33 (84.6%) patients who retained their childbearing potential, 17 (51.5%) had a second conization. 2 (6.1%) patients relapsed and underwent definitive treatment. After a median follow-up of 51 months (range 1-184) no deaths were reported. 22 (70.9%) patients attempted to conceive. There were 13 natural pregnancies among 12 (54.5%) women who got pregnant. Live birth rate was 76.9%: 9 (69.2%) term and 1 (7.7%) preterm (at 32 weeks) deliveries. 2 (15.4%) miscarriages (first and second trimester) and 1 (7.7%) termination of pregnancy for medical reasons were recorded. Conclusion Conization plus laparoscopic nodal evaluation may be a safe and feasible conservative option in the setting of fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage cervical cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 461
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review [J].
Bentivegna, Enrica ;
Gouy, Sebastien ;
Maulard, Amandine ;
Chargari, Cyrus ;
Leary, Alexandra ;
Morice, Philippe .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (06) :E240-E253
[2]   Cancer of the cervix uteri [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Aoki, Daisuke ;
Sharma, Daya Nand ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 :22-36
[3]   Long-term results of fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage cervical cancer [J].
Bogani, Giorgio ;
Chiappa, Valentina ;
Vinti, Daniele ;
Somigliana, Edgardo ;
Filippi, Francesca ;
Murru, Giulia ;
Murgia, Ferdinando ;
Martinelli, Fabio ;
Ditto, Antonino ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 (01) :89-94
[4]   A prospective multicenter trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (SENTIX) [J].
Cibula, David ;
Dusek, Ladislav ;
Jarkovsky, J. ;
Dundr, P. ;
Querleu, D. ;
van der Zee, A. ;
Kucukmetin, A. ;
Kocian, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (01) :212-215
[5]   Cervical cancer [J].
Cohen, Paul A. ;
Jhingran, Anjua ;
Oaknin, Ana ;
Denny, Lynette .
LANCET, 2019, 393 (10167) :169-182
[6]   Conservative management of cervical cancer: Current status and obstetrical implications [J].
Domgue, Joel Fokom ;
Schmeler, Kathleen M. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 55 :79-92
[7]  
Jemal A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.20115, 10.3322/caac.20107]
[8]   SENTICOL III: an international validation study of sentinel node biopsy in early cervical cancer. A GINECO, ENGOT, GCIG and multicenter study [J].
Lecuru, Fabrice R. ;
McCormack, Mary ;
Hillemanns, Peter ;
Anota, Amelie ;
Leitao, Mario ;
Mathevet, Patrice ;
Zweemer, Ronald ;
Fujiwara, Keiichi ;
Zanagnolo, Vanna ;
Eriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl ;
Hudson, Emma ;
Ferron, Gwenael ;
Plante, Marie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (04) :829-834
[9]   How often parametrial involvement leads to post-operative adjuvant treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type C radical hysterectomy? [J].
Martinelli, F. ;
Bogani, G. ;
Ditto, A. ;
Carcangiu, M. ;
Papadia, A. ;
Lecce, F. ;
Chiappa, V. ;
Lorusso, D. ;
Raspagliesi, F. .
EJSO, 2015, 41 (08) :1089-1096
[10]   Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors 2 cm or larger: A literature review and analysis of oncological and obstetrical outcomes [J].
Pareja, Rene ;
Rendon, Gabriel J. ;
Vasquez, Monica ;
Echeverri, Lina ;
Millan Sanz-Lomana, Carlos ;
Ramirez, Pedro T. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 (03) :574-580