Efficacy of laser surgery versus radiotherapy for treatment of glottic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
作者
Ding, Yongxia [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Binquan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Nursing Coll, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Key Lab Otolaryngol Head & Neck Canc, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Glottic carcinoma; Laryngeal preservation; Laser surgery; Meta-analysis; Radiotherapy; Recurrence; Systematic review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; CO2-LASER SURGERY; VOICE QUALITY; CANCER; MICROSURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; LARYNX; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10103-018-2695-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Laser surgery and radiotherapy are the two most common ways to treat glottic carcinomas, which is more efficacious and remains controversial. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies of laser surgery versus radiotherapy in patients with glottic carcinomas through April 2017. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. Eighteen studies were selected, which included 2480 patients. Patients who had laser surgery had higher rates of laryngeal preservation (OR 3.852; 95% CI 1.922-7.721) and overall survival (OR 1.388; 95% CI 1.063-1.811) versus who had radiotherapy. No significant differences were observed between laser surgery and radiotherapy on local control (OR 1.186; 95% CI 0.759-1.854), recurrence (OR 0.758; 95% CI 0.445-1.289), or disease-specific survival (OR 1.597; 95% CI 0.887-2.876). There were clinical benefits for patients with glottic carcinoma after laser surgery compared with radiotherapy with respect to survival and laryngeal preservation.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 854
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   TRANSORAL LASER SURGERY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS FOR TREATMENT OPTIONS OF T1a GLOTTIC CANCER [J].
Abdurehim, Yasin ;
Hua, Zhang ;
Yasin, Yalkun ;
Xukurhan, Ayihen ;
Imam, Ilham ;
Fan Yuqin .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2012, 34 (01) :23-33
[2]   The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models [J].
Ades, AE ;
Lu, G ;
Higgins, JPT .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (06) :646-654
[3]  
Ambrosch Petra, 2007, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V15, P82, DOI 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3280147336
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[5]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[6]   Laryngeal cancer: Diagnosis and preoperative work-up [J].
Chu, Eugene A. ;
Kim, Young J. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 41 (04) :673-+
[7]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463
[8]   Local recurrences following transoral laser surgery for early glottic carcinoma: Frequency, management, and outcome [J].
Eckel, HE .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 110 (01) :7-15
[9]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[10]   STAGE-T1 GLOTTIC CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF RADIATION-THERAPY OR LASER EXCISION [J].
EPSTEIN, BE ;
LEE, DJ ;
KASHIMA, H ;
JOHNS, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (02) :567-570