Integrated Approaches for National Ecosystem Assessment in South Korea

被引:4
作者
Choi, Hyun-Ah [1 ]
Song, Cholho [2 ]
Lee, Woo-Kyun [2 ]
Jeon, Seongwoo [2 ]
Gu, Jin Hyuk [3 ]
机构
[1] Haans Seidel Fdn, Korea Off, Seoul 04419, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Ecol Engn, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] NuriNet, Anyang 14054, South Korea
关键词
ecosystem service; spatial decision support; national assessment; conservation; national level; SERVICES; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; HOTSPOTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12205-017-1664-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services are the benefits people obtain from ecosystem functions. Ecosystem services can be quantified through an ecosystem assessment. Its goal is to assess the effects of changes in the ecosystem to support human welfare. Ecosystem services assessment approaches support policy, decision-making, and implementation to protect biodiversity and ecosystem at national, regional and global levels. For natural resources management National Ecosystem Assessment (NEA) was recently undertaken in Belgium, Spain, France and the UK, along with other ecosystem assessments at the national level. In South Korea, sustainable use of ecosystem services has attracted the interest of a range of policy makers. Although there is a greater concern for biodiversity and ecosystem services, linking ecosystems with conservation planning in South Korea remains a challenge. There is no implementation, framework or manual for NEA at the national level. Thus, this study proposes integrated assessment approaches that could be applied for decision-making at the national level in South Korea. This study demonstrated conceptual approaches step by step description for supporting natural resources management at national level. The proposed approaches can provide useful information for ecosystem services assessment, habitat conservation, conservation planning, and decision-making at the national level.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1641
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Ahn SoEun, 2013, [Journal of Environmental Policy, 환경정책연구], V12, P3
[2]  
[Anonymous], QUANTITATIVE APPROAC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Chelonian Conserv Biol
[4]  
Assessment Millennium Ecosystem, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[5]   Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E40-E50
[6]  
Bagstad Kenneth J., 2011, ARIES Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A guide to models and data
[7]   Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed [J].
Bai, Yang ;
Zhuang, Changwei ;
Ouyang, Zhiyun ;
Zheng, Hua ;
Jiang, Bo .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2011, 8 (02) :177-183
[8]   Comparing Spatially Explicit Ecological and Social Values for Natural Areas to Identify Effective Conservation Strategies [J].
Bryan, Brett Anthony ;
Raymond, Christopher Mark ;
Crossman, Neville David ;
King, Darran .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) :172-181
[9]  
CBD, 2011, C PART CONV BIOL DIZ
[10]   Conservation planning for ecosystem services [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Shaw, M. Rebecca ;
Cameron, David R. ;
Underwood, Emma C. ;
Daily, Gretchen C. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) :2138-2152