Research on the Optimal Aggregation Method of Decision Maker Preference Judgment Matrix for Group Decision Making

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Li, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Internet Things Engn, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ, Business Sch, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2019年 / 7卷
关键词
Group decision making; analytic hierarchy process; judgment matrices; aggregation; plant growth simulation algorithm (PGSA); ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; OPERATORS; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923463
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The main focus of this paper is to present a new aggregation method of judgment matrices, which is based on the optimal aggregation model and the efficient aggregation algorithm. The reciprocal elements in the decision maker judgment matrices are mapped into the corresponding points on the two-dimensional coordinates. We can express the differences between different decision makers' preferences by the Euclidean distance among these points. We use the plant growth simulation algorithm (PGSA) to obtain the optimal aggregation points which can reflect the opinions of the entire decision makers group. The aggregation matrix of decision maker preference is composed of these optimal aggregation points and the consistency test has been passed. Compared with the weighted geometric mean method (WGMM) and minimum distance method (MDM), the sum of Euclidean distances from the aggregation points to other given points in this paper is minimal. The validity and rationality of this method are also verified by the analysis and comparison of examples, which provides a new idea to solve the group decision making (GDM) problems.
引用
收藏
页码:78803 / 78816
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A group decision making method with intuitionistic triangular fuzzy preference relations and its application
    Zhang, Shaolin
    Meng, Fanyong
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 51 (04) : 2556 - 2573
  • [42] Reducing preference elicitation in group decision making
    Naamani-Dery, Lihi
    Kalech, Meir
    Rokach, Lior
    Shapira, Bracha
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 61 : 246 - 261
  • [43] Group Decision Making Based on Acceptably Consistent Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations
    Zhang, Zhen
    Yu, Wenyu
    Guo, Chonghui
    KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES, (KSS 2016), 2016, 660 : 165 - 174
  • [44] Heuristic aggregation of individual judgments in AHP group decision making using simulated annealing algorithm
    Blagojevic, Bosko
    Srdjevic, Bojan
    Srdjevic, Zorica
    Zoranovic, Tihomir
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 330 : 260 - 273
  • [45] Framework of Group Decision Making With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Information
    Liao, Huchang
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zeng, Xiao-Jun
    Merigo, Jose M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (04) : 1211 - 1227
  • [46] Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
    Nijstad, Bernard A.
    van Knippenberg, Daan
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 12 (01) : 22 - 49
  • [47] An approach to group decision-making with uncertain preference ordinals
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    Yue, Qi
    Feng, Bo
    Liu, Yang
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 58 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [48] Probabilistic Linguistic Group Decision-Making Method Based on Attribute Decision and Multiplicative Preference Relations
    Zhao, Huiyan
    Li, Boquan
    Li, Yongyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 23 (07) : 2200 - 2217
  • [49] An automatic method to reach consensus in a local context for AHP group decision making
    Dong, Yucheng
    Xu, Weijun
    Xu, Weidong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 7 (04) : 456 - 474
  • [50] Group decision making using bilateral agreement matrix
    Xia, Meimei
    Chen, Jian
    Zeng, Xiao-Jun
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 398 : 34 - 60