Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality

被引:3
|
作者
Ballantine, Kirsten R. [1 ,2 ]
Hanna, Susan [3 ]
Macfarlane, Scott [2 ,4 ]
Bradbeer, Peter [4 ,5 ]
Teague, Lochie [4 ]
Hunter, Sarah [4 ]
Cross, Siobhan [1 ]
Skeen, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Christchurch Hosp, Childrens Haematol Oncol Ctr, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Natl Child Canc Network, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Minist Hlth, New Zealand Canc Registry, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Starship Childrens Hosp, Starship Blood & Canc Ctr, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Auckland City Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Data quality; Cancer registry; Children; Completeness; Accuracy; Incidence; COMPLETENESS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2018.06.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the completeness and accuracy of child cancer registration in New Zealand. Methods: Registrations for children aged 0-14 diagnosed between 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2014 were obtained from the New Zealand Cancer Registry (NZCR) and the New Zealand Children's Cancer Registry (NZCCR). Six key data fields were matched using National Health Index numbers in order to identify and resolve registration discrepancies. Capture-recapture methods were used to assess the completeness of cancer registration. RESULTS: 794 unique cases were reported; 718 from the NZCR, 721 from the NZCCR and 643 from both registries. 27 invalid cancer registrations were identified, including 19 residents of the Pacific Islands who had travelled to New Zealand for treatment. The NZCCR provided 55 non-malignant central nervous system tumour and 16 Langerhans cell histiocytosis cases which were not registered by the NZCR. The NZCR alerted the NZCCR to 18 cases missed due to human error and 23 cases that had not been referred to the specialist paediatric oncology centres. 762 cases were verified as true incident cases, an incidence rate of 166.8 per million. Registration accuracy for six key data fields was 98.6%. According to their respective inclusion criteria case completeness was 99.3% for the NZCR and 94.4% for the NZCCR. For childhood malignancies covered by both registries, capture-recapture methods estimated case ascertainment at greater than 99.9%. CONCLUSION: With two national registries covering childhood cancers, New Zealand is uniquely positioned to undertake regular cooperative activities to ensure high quality data is available for research and patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 109
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours
    Leinonen, Maarit K.
    Miettinen, Joonas
    Heikkinen, Sanna
    Pitkaniemi, Janne
    Malila, Nea
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 77 : 31 - 39
  • [2] Data quality at the Singapore Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness
    Fung, Janice Wing Mei
    Lim, Sandra Bee Lay
    Zheng, Huili
    Ho, William Ying Tat
    Lee, Bee Guat
    Chow, Khuan Yew
    Lee, Hin Peng
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 43 : 76 - 86
  • [3] Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness
    Larsen, Inger Kristin
    Smastuen, Milada
    Johannesen, Tom Borge
    Langmark, Froydis
    Parkin, Donald Maxwell
    Bray, Freddie
    Moller, Bjorn
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (07) : 1218 - 1231
  • [4] The accuracy and completeness of childhood cancer registration in New Zealand
    John D. Dockerty
    David M.O. Becroft
    Margaret E. Lewis
    Sheila M. Williams
    Cancer Causes & Control, 1997, 8 : 857 - 864
  • [5] The accuracy and completeness of childhood cancer registration in New Zealand
    Dockerty, JD
    Becroft, DMO
    Lewis, ME
    Williams, SM
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1997, 8 (06) : 857 - 864
  • [6] Using the Benford's Law as a First Step to Assess the Quality of the Cancer Registry Data
    Crocetti, Emanuele
    Randi, Giorgia
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 4
  • [7] Evaluation of data quality at the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine
    Ryzhov, Anton
    Bray, Freddie
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Fedorenko, Zoya
    Goulak, Liudmyla
    Gorokh, Yevgeniy
    Soumkina, Olena
    Znaor, Ariana
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 53 : 156 - 165
  • [8] Evaluation of data quality at the Gambia national cancer registry
    Shimakawa, Yusuke
    Bah, Ebrima
    Wild, Christopher P.
    Hall, Andrew J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 132 (03) : 658 - 665
  • [9] Evaluation of data quality at the Hungarian National Cancer Registry, 2000-2019
    Weber, Andras
    Mery, Les
    Nagy, Peter
    Polgar, Csaba
    Bray, Freddie
    Kenessey, Istvan
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 82
  • [10] Is quality of registry treatment data related to registrar experience and workload? A study of Taiwan cancer registry data
    Cheng, Chin-Ying
    Chiang, Chun-Ju
    Hsieh, Cheng-Hsing
    Chang, You-Kang
    Lai, Mei-Shu
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 117 (12) : 1093 - 1100