History and Evolution of Surgical Ethics: John Gregory to the Twenty-first Century

被引:11
作者
Namm, Jukes P. [1 ,2 ]
Siegler, Mark [2 ]
Brander, Caroline [2 ]
Kim, Tae Yeon [2 ]
Lowe, Christian [2 ]
Angelos, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Med, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago Med, Dept Med, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGERY; LIVER; HOMOTRANSPLANTATION; CHALLENGES; TRIAL; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-014-2584-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
As surgery grew to become a respected medical profession in the eighteenth century, medical ethics emerged as a response to the growing need to protect patients and maintain the public's trust in physicians. The early influences of John Gregory and Thomas Percival were instrumental in the formulation of patient-centered medical ethics. In the late nineteenth century, the modern surgical advances of anesthesia and antisepsis created the need for a discipline of ethics specific to surgery in order to confront new and evolving ethical issues. One of the founding initiatives of the American College of Surgeons in 1913 was to eliminate unethical practices such as fee-splitting and itinerant surgery. As surgery continued to advance in the era of solid organ transplantation and minimally invasive surgery in the latter half of the twentieth century, surgical innovation and conflict of interest have emerged as important ethical issues moving forward into the twenty-first century. Surgical ethics has evolved into a distinct branch of medical ethics, and the core of surgical ethics is the surgeon-patient relationship and the surgeon's responsibility to advance and protect the well-being of the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:1568 / 1573
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American College of Surgeons Division of Member Services, 2012, FELL PELDG
[2]   The art of medicine The ethical challenges of surgical innovation for patient care [J].
Angelos, Peter .
LANCET, 2010, 376 (9746) :1046-1047
[3]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
BARKUN, AN ;
SAMPALIS, JS ;
FRIED, G ;
TAYLOR, B ;
WEXLER, MJ ;
GORESKY, CA ;
MEAKINS, JL .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828) :1116-1119
[4]  
Beauchamp TL, 1978, ENCY BIOETHICS, P1233
[5]   COMPLICATIONS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BERNARD, HR ;
HARTMAN, TW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :533-535
[6]   Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: A position statement of the Society of University Surgeons [J].
Biffl, Walter L. ;
Spain, David A. ;
Reitsma, Angelique M. ;
Minter, Rebecca M. ;
Upperman, Jeffrey ;
Wilson, Mark ;
Adams, Reid ;
Goldman, Edward B. ;
Angelos, Peter ;
Krummel, Thomas ;
Greenfield, Lazar J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (06) :1204-1209
[7]   MECHANISMS OF MAJOR BILIARY INJURY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
DAVIDOFF, AM ;
PAPPAS, TN ;
MURRAY, EA ;
HILLEREN, DJ ;
JOHNSON, RD ;
BAKER, ME ;
NEWMAN, GE ;
COTTON, PB ;
MEYERS, WC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (03) :196-202
[8]  
Fox RC, 1978, COURAGE FAIL SOCIAL, P9
[9]   AMELOBLASTOMA OF JAW - A CLINICAL STUDY [J].
GOLDWYN, R ;
CONSTABLE, J ;
MURRAY, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1963, 269 (03) :126-+
[10]  
Jones JamesW., 2008, The Ethics of Surgical Practice Cases, Dilemmas, and Resolutions