Differences in Online Consumer Ratings of Health Care Providers Across Medical, Surgical, and Allied Health Specialties: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers

被引:22
作者
Daskivich, Timothy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luu, Michael [3 ]
Noah, Benjamin [2 ]
Fuller, Garth [2 ,4 ]
Anger, Jennifer [1 ]
Spiegel, Brennan [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Urol, 8635 West 3rd St,Suite 1070W, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Cedars Sinai Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Samuel Oschin Comprehens Canc Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cedars Sinai Hlth Syst, Div Hlth Serv Res, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] UCLA Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
online ratings; consumer ratings; patient satisfaction; digital health; telemedicine; PHYSICIAN; SITES;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.9160
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care consumers are increasingly using online ratings to select providers, but differences in the distribution of scores across specialties and skew of the data have the potential to mislead consumers about the interpretation of ratings. Objective: The objective of our study was to determine whether distributions of consumer ratings differ across specialties and to provide specialty-specific data to assist consumers and clinicians in interpreting ratings. Methods: We sampled 212,933 health care providers rated on the Healthgrades consumer ratings website, representing 29 medical specialties (n=128,678), 15 surgical specialties (n=72,531), and 6 allied health (nonmedical, nonnursing) professions (n=11,724) in the United States. We created boxplots depicting distributions and tested the normality of overall patient satisfaction scores. We then determined the specialty-specific percentile rank for scores across groupings of specialties and individual specialties. Results: Allied health providers had higher median overall satisfaction scores (4.5, interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-5.0) than physicians in medical specialties (4.0, IQR 3.3-4.5) and surgical specialties (4.2, IQR 3.6-4.6, P<.001). Overall satisfaction scores were highly left skewed (normal between -0.5 and 0.5) for all specialties, but skewness was greatest among allied health providers (-1.23, 95% CI -1.280 to -1.181), followed by surgical (-0.77, 95% CI -0.787 to -0.755) and medical specialties (-0.64, 95% CI -0.648 to -0.628). As a result of the skewness, the percentages of overall satisfaction scores less than 4 were only 23% for allied health, 37% for surgical specialties, and 50% for medical specialties. Percentile ranks for overall satisfaction scores varied across specialties; percentile ranks for scores of 2 (0.7%, 2.9%, 0.8%), 3 (5.8%, 16.6%, 8.1%), 4 (23.0%, 50.3%, 37.3%), and 5 (63.9%, 89.5%, 86.8%) differed for allied health, medical specialties, and surgical specialties, respectively. Conclusions: Online consumer ratings of health care providers are highly left skewed, fall within narrow ranges, and differ by specialty, which precludes meaningful interpretation by health care consumers. Specialty-specific percentile ranks may help consumers to more meaningfully assess online physician ratings.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PHYS PERF BAS COMP
[2]   Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians [J].
Burkle, Christopher M. ;
Keegan, Mark T. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
[3]  
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, MED PHYS COMP
[4]   Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review [J].
Daskivich, Timothy J. ;
Houman, Justin ;
Fuller, Garth ;
Black, Jeanne T. ;
Kim, Hyung L. ;
Spiegel, Brennan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (04) :401-407
[5]   Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Meier, Florian ;
Pisch, Frank ;
Sander, Uwe .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (08)
[6]   Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review [J].
Emmert, Martin ;
Sander, Uwe ;
Pisch, Frank .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (02) :e24
[7]  
Goldman E, 2013, DOCTORS SHOULD RESPO
[8]   Public Awareness, Perception, and Use of Online Physician Rating Sites [J].
Hanauer, David A. ;
Zheng, Kai ;
Singer, Dianne C. ;
Gebremariam, Achamyeleh ;
Davis, Matthew M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (07) :734-735
[9]   Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Holliday, Alison M. ;
Kachalia, Allen ;
Meyer, Gregg S. ;
Sequist, Thomas D. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 (06) :626-631
[10]  
Jha A. K., 2015, HARVARD BUSINESS REV