LMA Supreme™ and Ambu® AuraGain™ in anesthetized adult patients: a prospective observational study

被引:14
作者
Kriege, Marc [1 ]
Piepho, Tim [1 ]
Zanker, Susanne [1 ]
Alflen, Christian [1 ]
Heid, Florian [1 ]
Noppens, Ruediger R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Anesthesiol, Univ Med Ctr, Langenbeckstr 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
关键词
Laryngeal masks; Airway management; Complications; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; GEL SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY; PARALYZED PATIENTS; TRIAL; ANESTHESIA; INSERTION; I-GEL(TM); CHILDREN; DEVICES; CUFF;
D O I
10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11112-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Second-generation laryngeal masks with gastric access are increasingly used in daily practice and expand the indications for laryngeal masks in the OR. Only limited data exist comparing different types of laryngeal masks. We investigated the second-generation laryngeal masks LMA Supreme (TM) and Ambu((R)) AuraGain (TM) in a clinical setting. We hypothesized that the two devices would be comparable in terms of success rate and airway complications. METHODS: After approval from the local ethics committee, data were collected in a prospective trial. Endpoints were success rate, time to insertion and airway morbidity. Anesthesiologists used either the Supreme (Teleflex Medical GmbH) or Gain (Ambu GmbH) laryngeal mask. Patients < 18 years and those with a possible risk of regurgitation were excluded. RESULTS: Data from 351 adult patients were documented (Supreme N=177; Gain N=174). Success rate for first attempt was 80% (Supreme) and 72% (Gain; P=0.08). Overall success rate was 89% and 92%, respectively (P=0.38). Providers with minimal experience were more successful at first attempt using Supreme (95%), compared to Gain (67%; P=0.01). The median insertion time was shorter in Supreme at 18 s [interquartile range (IQR), 14-25 s] compared to 30 s for Gain [18-41s] (P<0.0001). A higher incidence of airway complications was observed after device removal for Gain (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Supreme was superior to Gain in terms of insertion time and airway morbidity. Novices were more successful at first attempt using Supreme. These differences between supraglottic airway devices might be due to the different shapes and materials of the masks.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 174
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ana M., 2014, OPEN J ANESTHESIOL, V4, P332
[2]   Editorial I - Confidence in statistical analysis [J].
Asai, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (06) :807-U1
[3]   The intubating laryngeal mask - Results of a multicentre trial with experience of 500 cases [J].
Baskett, PJF ;
Parr, MJA ;
Nolan, JP .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (12) :1174-1179
[4]   A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel™ airway during anaesthesia in 120 children [J].
Beringer, R. M. ;
Kelly, F. ;
Cook, T. M. ;
Nolan, J. ;
Hardy, R. ;
Simpson, T. ;
White, M. C. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (12) :1121-1126
[5]   The I-gel®, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children [J].
Beylacq, L. ;
Bordes, M. ;
Semjen, F. ;
Cros, A. -M. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 53 (03) :376-379
[6]  
BRAIN AIJ, 1985, ANAESTHESIA, V40, P356
[7]   Emergence characteristics and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Holyoake, L ;
Keller, C ;
Barry, J ;
Mecklem, D ;
Blinco, A ;
Weidmann, K .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (04) :338-343
[8]   INSERTION OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 4 TECHNIQUES [J].
BRIMACOMBE, J ;
BERRY, A .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1993, 21 (01) :89-92
[9]   Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion -: A fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Pühringer, F .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (06) :1661-1665
[10]  
Chapman D, 2010, ANAESTHESIA, V65, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06176_1.x