Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG): Stimulation Mechanism, Safety, and Efficacy

被引:24
作者
Tepper, Stewart J. [1 ]
Caparso, Anthony [2 ]
机构
[1] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Neurol, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Auton Technol Inc, Redwood City, CA USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2017年 / 57卷
关键词
cluster headache; sphenopalatine ganglion; SPG; neuromodulation; neurostimulation; CLUSTER HEADACHE; PTERYGOPALATINE GANGLION; INTRANASAL LIDOCAINE; MIGRAINE; ATTACKS; ACTIVATION; THERAPY; OXYGEN; MANAGEMENT; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1111/head.13035
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-To describe the history of and available data on sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) neuromodulation in the treatment of headache up to the present. Background.-The SPG has been a therapeutic target to treat primary headache disorders for over 100 years. Multiple destructive lesions have also been tried with variable rate and duration of success. Neurostimulation of the SPG for cluster headache was first described in 2007. Methods.-This is not a systematic review. The authors review the anatomy and pathophysiology of the SPG and cluster headache and the important clinical trials, relating a history of how SPG neuromodulation reached the current state of approval in the European Union (EU) and pivotal registration study for cluster headache in the US. Results.-The EU approved SPG stimulation for cluster headache with a CE Mark in February of 2012. Since then, several EU countries have elected to reimburse implantation for cluster headache, and over 300 patients have been implanted worldwide. Conclusions.-Success rates for implanted SPG neuromodulation in the experimental phase of the European randomized controlled trial, in the open label extension trial, and in the registry of patients implanted outside of the trial remain at about two-thirds of patients implanted being responders, defined as being able to terminate at least 50% of attacks or having at least a 50% decrease in attack frequency or both. A US pivotal registration study is underway to confirm these results and obtain FDA approval for this treatment for cluster headache patients. Further studies in migraine are also underway.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 28
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Oxygen Inhibits Neuronal Activation in the Trigeminocervical Complex After Stimulation of Trigeminal Autonomic Reflex, But Not During Direct Dural Activation of Trigeminal Afferents
    Akerman, Simon
    Holland, Philip R.
    Lasalandra, Michele P.
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2009, 49 (08): : 1131 - 1143
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, CLIN ANATOMY MASTICA
  • [3] Electrical Stimulation of Sphenopalatine Ganglion for Acute Treatment of Cluster Headaches
    Ansarinia, Mehdi
    Rezai, Ali
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Steiner, Charles P.
    Stump, Jenna
    Stanton-Hicks, Michael
    Machado, Andre
    Narouze, Samer
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2010, 50 (07): : 1164 - 1174
  • [4] Technical and surgical aspects of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) microstimulator insertion procedure
    Assaf, A. T.
    Hillerup, S.
    Rostgaard, J.
    Puche, M.
    Blessmann, M.
    Kohlmeier, C.
    Pohlenz, P.
    Klatt, J. C.
    Heiland, M.
    Caparso, A.
    Papay, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [5] Bayer Erin, 2005, Pain Pract, V5, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2005.05314.x
  • [6] Beck E, 2005, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V71, P717
  • [7] Unitary hypothesis for multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine
    Burstein, R
    Jakubowski, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2005, 493 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [8] High-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache A Randomized Trial
    Cohen, Anna S.
    Burns, Brian
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (22): : 2451 - 2457
  • [9] Cook N, 1978, Res Clin Stud Headache, V5, P86
  • [10] The effect of intranasal cocaine and lidocaine on nitroglycerin-induced attacks in cluster headache
    Costa, A
    Pucci, E
    Antonaci, F
    Sances, G
    Granella, F
    Broich, G
    Nappi, G
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2000, 20 (02) : 85 - 91