The interface issue in second language acquisition research: An interdisciplinary perspective

被引:1
作者
Forys-Nogala, Magorzata [1 ,2 ]
Krajewski, Grzegorz [2 ]
Haman, Ewa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ & Human Sci Warsaw, Fac Psychol, Ul Okopowa 59, PL-01043 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Psychol, Ul Stawki 5-7, PL-00183 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
The interface issue; L2 syntactic acquisition; Implicit knowledge; Explicit knowledge; The declarative; pro-cedural model; SEQUENCE-LEARNING-ABILITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY-SYSTEMS; LANGUAGE; ATTENTION; INSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103243
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The interface issue concerning the nature of interactions between explicit and implicit linguistic knowledge in second language acquisition (SLA) has been a focus of widespread academic interest for almost four decades. However, despite intense debate at the theoretical level and emerging methodologically rigorous studies related to the topic, the issue remains unresolved. With this overview paper, we hope to offer a contribution to the pending theoretical and methodological topics related to the interface in acquiring L2 syntax. First, the paper discusses the definitions and operationalization criteria of implicit and explicit knowledge, as well as their interface. Then, we review the methods and findings of representative studies on domain-general learning and second language acquisition that have explored the interactions between implicit and explicit learning systems. Specifically, we identify the types of interactions that are tenable according to the literature in cognitive psychology and seek evidence for those interactions in the results of published state-of-the-art research. Finally, we compile methodological recommendations for further SLA studies exploring the interface. Following other scholars, throughout the discussion, we argue that bringing the field closer to resolving the interface issue requires an interdisciplinary approach that combines insights and methods from linguistic, psychological and neurocognitive research traditions.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 137 条
[2]   HOW EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE AFFECTS ONLINE L2 PROCESSING Evidence from Differential Object Marking Acquisition [J].
Andringa, Sible ;
Curcic, Maja .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2015, 37 (02) :237-268
[3]   Effect of Explicit and Implicit Instruction on Free Written Response Task Performance [J].
Andringa, Sible ;
de Glopper, Kees ;
Hacquebord, Hilde .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2011, 61 (03) :868-903
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL CE
[5]  
[Anonymous], TIME RES 2 LANGUAGE, DOI [10.4324/9780203146255, DOI 10.4324/9780203146255]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LEARNING TEACHING LA
[7]  
Baars B. J., 1993, COGNITIVE THEORY CON
[8]   The Human Brain Processes Syntax in the Absence of Conscious Awareness [J].
Batterink, Laura ;
Neville, Helen J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (19) :8528-8533
[9]   Implicit and Explicit Second Language Training Recruit Common Neural Mechanisms for Syntactic Processing [J].
Batterink, Laura ;
Neville, Helen .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 25 (06) :936-951
[10]   Functional differences between statistical learning with and without explicit training [J].
Batterink, Laura J. ;
Reber, Paul J. ;
Paller, Ken A. .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2015, 22 (11) :544-556