Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study

被引:2
|
作者
Fenoglietto, P. [1 ]
Khodri, M. [2 ]
Nguyen, D. [3 ]
Josserand-Pietri, F. [4 ]
Ailleres, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Reg Canc Montpellier ICM, Dept Oncol Radiotherapie, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] ICL, Dept Oncol Radiotherapie, St Etienne, France
[3] Grp ORLAM, Serv Radiotherapie, Macon, France
[4] Grp ORLAM, Serv Radiotherapie, Villeurbanne, France
关键词
VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; DYNAMIC IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; DELIVERY; THERAPY; RAPIDARC; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc (TM) device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. Patients and Methods: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc (TM) technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. Results: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 +/- 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 +/- 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 +/- 1.26 % and 98.59 +/- 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 +/- 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. Conclusion: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical practice and evaluation of electronic portal imaging device for VMAT quality assurance
    Huang, Yen-Cho
    Yeh, Chien-Yi
    Yeh, Jih-Hsiang
    Lo, Ching-Jung
    Tsai, Ping-Fang
    Hung, Chih-Hung
    Tsai, Chieh-Sheng
    Chen, Chen-Yuan
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [2] A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device
    Zhang, Jun
    Li, Xiuqing
    Lu, Miaomiao
    Zhang, Qilin
    Zhang, Xile
    Yang, Ruijie
    Chan, Maria F.
    Wen, Junhai
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [3] A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device
    Jun Zhang
    Xiuqing Li
    Miaomiao Lu
    Qilin Zhang
    Xile Zhang
    Ruijie Yang
    Maria F. Chan
    Junhai Wen
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [4] Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device
    Sait, A. Aziz
    Yoganathan, S. A.
    Jones, Glenn W.
    Patel, Tusar
    Rastogi, Nikhil
    Pandey, S. P.
    Mani, Sunil
    Boopathy, Raghavendiran
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2024, 10 (05):
  • [5] Development of calibration Procedure of an Electronic Portal Imaging Device a-Si1000 Used for IMRT and VMAT
    Maachou, A.
    Toutaoui, A. E. K.
    Toutaoui-Khelassi, N.
    Louelh, R.
    Brahimi-Sakhri, Z.
    Chami, A. C.
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADIATIONS AND APPLICATIONS (ICRA-2017), 2018, 1994
  • [6] Feasibility study of patient positioning verification in electron beam radiotherapy with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Ramm, U.
    Koehn, J.
    Dominguez, R. Rodriguez
    Licher, J.
    Koch, N.
    Kara, E.
    Scherf, C.
    Roedel, C.
    Weiss, C.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (02): : 215 - 220
  • [7] A quality assurance program for an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device using in-house developed phantoms: a method development for dosimetry purposes
    Jomehzadeh, A.
    Shokrani, P.
    Mohammadi, M.
    Amouheidari, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 12 (03): : 257 - 264
  • [8] Verification of compensator thicknesses using a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device
    Pasma, KL
    Kroonwijk, M
    van Dieren, EB
    Visser, AG
    Heijmen, BJM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) : 1524 - 1529
  • [9] Quality assurance of electron beams using a Varian electronic portal imaging device
    Wang, Y.
    Heaton, R.
    Norrlinger, B.
    Islam, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (16): : 5461 - 5475
  • [10] Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device
    Samant, SS
    Zheng, W
    Parra, NA
    Chandler, J
    Gopal, A
    Wu, J
    Jain, J
    Zhu, YP
    Sontag, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (12) : 2900 - 2912