Clinical decision support tool for Co-management signalling

被引:10
|
作者
Horta, Alexandra Bayao [1 ,2 ]
Salgado, Catia [3 ]
Fernandes, Marta [3 ]
Vieira, Susana [3 ]
Sousa, Joao M. [3 ]
Papoila, Ana Luisa [1 ]
Xavier, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] NOVA Med Sch, Fac Ciencias Med, Campo Martires da Patria 130, P-1169056 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Hosp Luz Lisboa, Av Lusiada 100, P-1600650 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, IDMEC, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Co-management; High risk patients; Internal Medicine; Failure to rescue; Decision support tool; Multistage modelling; SURGICAL-PATIENTS; MORTALITY; SURGERY; PREDICTION; MODELS; CARE; ICU;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.014
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: Co-management between internists and surgeons of selected patients is becoming one of the pillars of modern clinical management in large hospitals. Defining the patients to be co-managed is essential. The aim of this study is to create a decision tool using real-world patient data collected in the preoperative period, to support the decision on which patients should have the co-management service offered. Methods: Data was collected from the electronic clinical health records of patients who had an International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) code of colorectal surgery during the period between January 2012 and October 2014 in a 200 bed private teaching hospital in Lisbon. ICD-9 codes of colorectal surgery [48.5 and 48.6 (anterior rectal resection and abdominoperineal resection), 45.7 (partial colectomy), 45.8 (Total Colectomy), and 45.9 (Bowel Anastomosis)1 were used. Only patients above 18 years old were considered. Patients with more than one procedure were excluded from the study. From these data the authors investigated the construction of predictive models using logistic regression and Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy modelling. Results: Data contains information obtained from the clinical records of a cohort of 344 adult patients. Data from 398 emergent and elective surgeries were collected, from which 54 were excluded because they were second procedures for the same patients. Four preoperative variables were identified as being the most predictive of co-management, in multivariable regression analysis. The final model performed well after being internally validated (0.81 AUC, 77% accuracy, 74% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 93% negative predictive value). The results indicate that the decision process can be more objective and potentially automated. Conclusions: The authors developed a prediction model based on preoperative characteristics, in order to support the decision for the co-management of surgical patients in the postoperative ward setting. The model is a simple bedside decision tool that uses only four numerical variables.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 62
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision support tool for accidental pollution management
    Ciolofan, Sorin N.
    Draghia, Aurelian
    Drobot, Radu
    Mocanu, Mariana
    Cristea, Valentin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (07) : 7090 - 7097
  • [22] A TOOL OF DECISION SUPPORT FOR THE NATURAL RISK MANAGEMENT
    Abdat, Nadia
    Alimazighi, Zaia
    ICEIS 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL AIDSS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, : 579 - 582
  • [23] A unified decision support tool for product management
    Cook, HE
    COOPERATIVE KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN, 1999, : 47 - 59
  • [24] Decision support tool for accidental pollution management
    Sorin N. Ciolofan
    Aurelian Draghia
    Radu Drobot
    Mariana Mocanu
    Valentin Cristea
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 7090 - 7097
  • [25] A Decision Support Tool for Wastewater Catchment Management
    Walters, S. E.
    Savic, D.
    Hocking, R. J.
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02):
  • [26] A decision support tool for emergency management planning
    Wang, Haibo
    Alidaee, Bahrani
    Altinakar, Mustafa
    International Conference on Management Innovation, Vols 1 and 2, 2007, : 34 - 40
  • [27] An Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Reply
    Raja, Ali S.
    Prevedello, Luciano M.
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Sodickson, Aaron
    Khorasani, Ramin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 127 (05):
  • [28] Usability and Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Support Tool
    Zoucha, S.
    Bailly, D.
    Winder, M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 71 (01) : NP561 - NP561
  • [29] A knowledge authoring tool for clinical decision support
    Dunsmuir D.
    Daniels J.
    Brouse C.
    Ford S.
    Ansermino J.M.
    J. Clin. Monit. Comput., 2008, 3 (189-198): : 189 - 198
  • [30] Clinical Decision Support: A Tool of the Hospital Trade
    Poon, Eric G.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (01) : 60 - 61