Research on the evaluation and selection of partner in knowledge share between logistics enterprises based on AHP-TOPSIS

被引:0
作者
Zhang Xiangying [1 ]
Wang Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15 | 2007年
关键词
knowledge share; partner; selection; evaluation; AHP; TOPSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Since information technologies has become global to address the needs of the global market, companies take advantage of advanced information technologies in achieving their global supply chain. Knowledge share is now recognized as a key, competitive advantage of logistics enterprises. In the global economy, cooperation and alliance-based knowledge are increasingly important as the way of sharing knowledge interorganizationally. Yet, research into interorganizational knowledge share has been underdeveloped. So the selection of knowledge share partners has become the most important and serious problem for the logistics enterprises to make decisions. Partners' performance decides the effectiveness of the knowledge share and can lead to the success and failure of knowledge share. The evaluation and selection of appropriate partner is a multi-objective and multi-layer comprehensive problem, and some evaluation factors are subjective. To evaluate the partners objectively, this paper establishes the index system of partners in knowledge share according to SCOR index model. In the process of evaluating and selecting partners based on AHP method, we import the TOPSIS method to standardize the evaluation result so that we can get more objective and effective evaluation result and get the final appropriate partner.
引用
收藏
页码:4367 / 4370
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] CHEN CT, 2000, EXTENSIONS TOPSIS GR
  • [2] GE W, 2004, INT J PRODUCTION EC
  • [3] Lewis J.D., 1990, PARTNERSHIPS PROFIT
  • [4] MATHEWS J, 1996, J ENG CONSTRUCTION A
  • [5] MER FC, 2004, MATH COMPUTER MODELI
  • [6] MERRIFIELD B, 1989, STRATEGIC ALLIANCE G
  • [7] Saaty TL., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation