Accuracy of intraoperative estimation of femoral stem anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty by using a digital protractor and a spirit level

被引:5
作者
Pongkunakorn, Anuwat [1 ]
Phetpangnga, Nawakun [1 ]
Kananai, Narawit [1 ]
机构
[1] Lampang Hosp & Med Educ Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lampang, Thailand
关键词
Femoral stem anteversion; cementless total hip arthroplasty; digital protractor; spirit level;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-020-02183-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe femoral component anteversion during surgery is traditionally assessed by a visual assessment of the surgeon and has proven to be imprecise. We sought to determine the accuracy of a digital protractor and a spirit level to measure the stem anteversion during cementless THA.MethodsA prospective study was conducted among 107 patients (114 hips) who underwent primary cementless THA via posterolateral approach. A pipe with a spirit level was attached to the tibial tubercle and intermalleolar midpoint. While the leg was held perpendicularly to the floor, stem anteversion was estimated by 3 methods: method A by visual assessment; method B by a digital protractor alone; and method C by a digital protractor combined with a spirit level. The angles were compared with the true anteversion measured by postoperative CT scan.ResultsThe average anteversion by method C (22.8 degrees 6.9 degrees, range -2 degrees to 40 degrees) was significantly lower than method A (24.6 degrees 5.2 degrees, range 0 degrees to 30 degrees) (p=0.033), but not different from the true anteversion (22.1 degrees +/- 8.2 degrees, range -5.4 degrees to 43.1 degrees) (p=0.445). There were no significant differences between method B (23.2 degrees +/- 8.2 degrees, range -4 degrees to 45 degrees) and method A, C or the true anteversion. The mean deviation of the intraoperative estimation from the true anteversion was 0.8 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees (range -7.1 degrees to 8.0 degrees) by method C; 1.2 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees (range -8.8 degrees to 14.3 degrees) by method B; and 2.5 degrees +/- 7.4 degrees (range -19.0 degrees to 16.0 degrees) by method A. Estimation error within 5 degrees was found in 107 hips (93.9%) with method C; 86 hips (75.4%) with method B; and 59 hips (51.8%) with method A.ConclusionAccurate estimation of stem anteversion during cementless THA can be determined intraoperatively by the use of a digital protractor and a spirit level.Trial registrationThai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR 20180326003). Registered on 20 March 2018. Retrospectively registered.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Can the use of an inclinometer improve the positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty? [J].
Darrith, B. ;
Bell, J. A. ;
Culvern, C. ;
Della Valle, C. J. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (07) :862-866
[2]   A Comparison of Surgeon Estimation and Computed Tomographic Measurement of Femoral Component Anteversion in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Dorr, Lawrence D. ;
Wan, Zhinian ;
Malik, Aamer ;
Zhu, Jinjun ;
Dastane, Manish ;
Deshmane, Prashant .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (11) :2598-2604
[3]   Combined Anteversion Technique for Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Dorr, Lawrence D. ;
Malik, Aamer ;
Dastane, Manish ;
Wan, Zhinian .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (01) :119-127
[4]   Reliable acetabular cup orientation with a new gravity-assisted guidance system [J].
Echeverri, S ;
Leyvraz, PF ;
Zambelli, PY ;
Jolles, BM .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (03) :413-419
[5]   Surgeon Error in Performing Intraoperative Estimation of Stem Anteversion in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Hirata, Masanobu ;
Nakashima, Yasuharu ;
Ohishi, Masanobu ;
Hamai, Satoshi ;
Hara, Daisuke ;
Iwamoto, Yukihide .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (09) :1648-1653
[6]   Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty [J].
Howell, Stephen M. ;
Chen, Justin ;
Hull, Maury L. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (10) :2288-2295
[7]   A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research [J].
Koo, Terry K. ;
Li, Mae Y. .
JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 15 (02) :155-163
[8]   Validity of the intra-operative measurement of stem anteversion and factors for the erroneous estimation in cementless total hip arthroplasty using postero-lateral approach [J].
Lee, Y. K. ;
Kim, J. W. ;
Kim, T. Y. ;
Ha, Y. C. ;
Koo, K. H. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) :341-346
[9]   A New Surgical Instrument and Technique Designed To Achieve More Accurate Component Placement in Total Hip Replacement [J].
Leone, William A. ;
Nevelos, Jim E. ;
Fonti, Francesca ;
Patel, Amisha .
TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 26 (03) :217-221
[10]   A comparison of five approaches to measurement of anatomic knee alignment from radiographs [J].
McDaniel, G. ;
Mitchell, K. L. ;
Charles, C. ;
Kraus, V. B. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2010, 18 (02) :273-277