Intra-abdominal Pressure and Trunk Muscular Activities during Abdominal Bracing and Hollowing

被引:42
作者
Tayashiki, K. [1 ]
Takai, Y. [2 ]
Maeo, S. [3 ]
Kanehisa, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Fitness & Sports Kanoya, Sport & Life Sci, Kanoya, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Fitness & Sports Kanoya, Sport Performance, 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima 8912393, Japan
[3] Waseda Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
stabilization exercise; electromyogram; repeatability; task specificity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; MUSCLE COCONTRACTION; ACTIVATION; STIFFNESS; PROGRAM; EMG;
D O I
10.1055/s-0035-1559771
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This study examined the difference in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) between abdominal bracing and hollowing in relation to trunk muscular activities. IAP with a pressure transducer placed in the rectum and surface electromyograms for rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, and erector spinae during the 2 tasks were obtained in 7 young adult men. The difference between IAP at rest and its peak value (IAPmax) showed high intra- and inter-day repeatability, and was significantly greater in abdominal bracing (116.4 +/- 15.0mmHg) than in abdominal hollowing (9.9 +/- 4.5mmHg). The trunk muscular activities at IAPmax were significantly higher in abdominal bracing than in abdominal hollowing, and in the internal oblique than in the other 3 muscles. In both abdominal bracing and hollowing, the changes in IAP during the tasks were linearly correlated with those in trunk muscular activities, but the slope of the regression line for the relationship differed between the 2 tasks. The current results indicate that 1) abdominal bracing is an effective maneuver to elevate IAP compared with abdominal hollowing, and 2) in the 2 tasks, the changes in IAP are linked with those in trunk muscular activities, but the association is task-specific.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 143
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STAT KINESIOLOGY
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions? [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
Ivancic, PC ;
Radebold, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (02) :127-133
[4]   CHANGES IN INTRAABDOMINAL PRESSURE, TRUNK MUSCLE ACTIVATION AND FORCE DURING ISOKINETIC LIFTING AND LOWERING [J].
CRESSWELL, AG ;
THORSTENSSON, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 68 (04) :315-321
[5]   OBSERVATIONS ON INTRAABDOMINAL PRESSURE AND PATTERNS OF ABDOMINAL INTRA-MUSCULAR ACTIVITY IN MAN [J].
CRESSWELL, AG ;
GRUNDSTROM, H ;
THORSTENSSON, A .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 144 (04) :409-418
[6]  
CRESSWELL AG, 1994, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V26, P79
[7]   Does an Abdominal Strengthening Program Influence Leg Stiffness During Hopping Tasks? [J].
Dupeyron, Arnaud ;
Hertzog, Maxime ;
Micallef, Jean-Paul ;
Perrey, Stephane .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (08) :2129-2133
[8]   Fast development of high intra-abdominal pressure when a trained participant is exposed to heavy, sudden trunk loads [J].
Essendrop, M ;
Hye-Knudsen, CT ;
Skotte, J ;
Hansen, AF ;
Schibye, B .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (01) :94-99
[9]   Increase in spinal stability obtained at levels of intra-abdominal pressure and back muscle activity realistic to work situations [J].
Essendrop, M ;
Andersen, TB ;
Schibye, B .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2002, 33 (05) :471-476
[10]   INTRA-ABDOMINAL AND INTRA-THORACIC PRESSURES DURING LIFTING AND JUMPING [J].
HARMAN, EA ;
FRYKMAN, PN ;
CLAGETT, ER ;
KRAEMER, WJ .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1988, 20 (02) :195-201