Wind turbine cost reduction: A detailed bottom-up analysis of innovation drivers

被引:61
作者
Elia, A. [1 ,3 ]
Taylor, M. [2 ]
OGallachoir, B. [1 ,3 ]
Rogan, F. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Environm Res Inst, MaREI Ctr, Energy & Policy Modelling Grp, Lee Rd, Cork, Ireland
[2] IRENA Innovat & Technol Ctr, Robert Schuman Pl 3, Bonn, Germany
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Engn, Coll Rd, Cork, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Onshore wind technology; Bottom-up cost model; Technology learning; Innovation drivers; Technology innovation; LEARNING-CURVE ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; EXPERIENCE CURVES; ENERGY SECTOR; POWER; CHINA; SCALE; ECONOMIES; OFFSHORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111912
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Wind energy technologies have seen a rapid decline in costs in the last two decades, but the drivers for these cost reductions are poorly understood. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by quantitatively investigating the drivers behind the cost reductions of onshore wind turbines between 2005 and 2017. Starting from a bottom-up cost model, the paper advances the methodology by identifying the techno-economic variables responsible for cost reductions of individual components (in $/kW) and linking them to drivers, specifically: learning by deployment, learning-by-researching, supply-chain dynamics, and market dynamics. The analysis finds that changes in materials (copper, fiberglass, and iron), labour (employee productivity), legal and financial costs contributed over 30% to the cost reduction of wind turbine prices over the period 2005-2017. Moreover, learning-by-deployment was the most important innovation driver, being responsible for half of the cost reduction. The findings point to the importance of policies tailored to technology's stage of development. For onshore wind energy, which entered a mature phase in the period covered by this analysis, policy support for the needs of a growing industry such as stable support schemes together with appropriate regulatory and investment environments were more important than direct policy support for R&D which played a more important role in earlier periods.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Ait-Yahia K., 2018, COFACE EC
[2]   Levelised cost of energy - A theoretical justification and critical assessment [J].
Aldersey-Williams, J. ;
Rubert, T. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 124 :169-179
[3]  
Anna H., 2018, BLOOMBERG EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Renewable energy statistics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Annual Report
[7]   Implications of high renewable electricity penetration in the US for water use, greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, and materials supply [J].
Arent, Doug ;
Pless, Jacquelyn ;
Mai, Trieu ;
Wiser, Ryan ;
Hand, Maureen ;
Baldwin, Sam ;
Heath, Garvin ;
Macknick, Jordan ;
Bazilian, Morgan ;
Schlosser, Adam ;
Denholm, Paul .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 123 :368-377
[8]   Crowdfunding for sustainability ventures [J].
Bento, Nuno ;
Gianfrate, Gianfranco ;
Thoni, Marco Horst .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
[9]   The construction of a new technological innovation system in a follower country: Wind energy in Portugal [J].
Bento, Nuno ;
Fontes, Margarida .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 99 :197-210
[10]   Understanding wind turbine price trends in the U.S. over the past decade [J].
Bolinger, Mark ;
Wiser, Ryan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :628-641