Repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test before prostate biopsy: a 20% decrease in PSA values is associated with a reduced risk of cancer and particularly of high-grade cancer

被引:18
作者
De Nunzio, Cosimo [1 ]
Lombardo, Riccardo [1 ]
Nacchia, Antonio [1 ]
Tema, Giorgia [1 ]
Tubaro, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Osped St Andrea, Rome, Italy
关键词
prostate specific antigen; cancer risk; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; POPULATION; PREDICTION; NOMOGRAM; COHORT; ERSPC; MEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14197
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse the impact of repeating a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level assessment on prostate biopsy decision in a cohort of men undergoing prostate biopsy. Patients and MethodsFrom 2015 onwards, we consecutively enrolled, at a single institution in Italy, men undergoing 12-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate needle biopsy. Indication for prostate biopsy was a PSA level of 4 ng/mL. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data were collected. The PSA level was tested at enrolment (PSA(1)) and 4 weeks later on the day before biopsy (PSA(2)). Variations in PSA level were defined as: stable PSA(2) within a 10% variation, stable PSA(2) within a 20% variation, PSA(2) decreased by 10%, PSA(2) decreased by 20%, PSA(2) increased by 10%, PSA(2) increased by 20%, and PSA(2) <4 ng/mL. Percentages and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyse biopsy outcomes. High-grade cancer was defined as Grade group 3. ResultsOverall, 331 patients were enrolled. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 153/331 (46%) patients and of them 80/153 (52%) had high-grade disease. When compared to the rest of the population, patients with a stable PSA within 20% variation had a higher risk of prostate cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.80, P < 0.05) and high grade disease (OR 2.56, P < 0.05), patients with a PSA2 decreased by 20% had a lower risk of prostate cancer (OR 0.37, P < 0.05) and high grade disease (OR 0.13, P < 0.05), whilst patients with a PSA2 increased by 10% had an increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer (OR 1.93, P < 0.05). When PSA returned to normal values (<4 ng/mL) both risks of prostate cancer and high-grade disease were reduced (OR 0.33 and 0.01, respectively, P = 0.001). ConclusionIn a cohort of Italian men undergoing prostate biopsy, a reduction of 20% in PSA levels significantly reduced the risk of high-grade prostate cancer. Further multicentre studies should validate our present results.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 88
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] The impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of PSA in men undergoing prostate biopsy
    Banez, Lionel L.
    Albisinni, Simone
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Tubaro, Andrea
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (02) : 323 - 328
  • [2] Development and external validation of an extended 10-core biopsy nomogram
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Graefen, Markus
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Porter, Christopher
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Gallina, Andrea
    Walz, Jochen
    Haese, Alexander
    Steuber, Thomas
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Currlin, Eike
    Valiquette, Luc
    Heinzer, Hans
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (02) : 436 - 445
  • [3] Inflammatory mediators in the development and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Presicce, Fabrizio
    Tubaro, Andrea
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (10) : 613 - 626
  • [4] Physical activity as a risk factor for prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective biopsy cohort analysis
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Presicce, Fabrizio
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Cancrini, Fabiana
    Petta, Stefano
    Trucchi, Alberto
    Gacci, Mauro
    Cindolo, Luca
    Tubaro, Andrea
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (6B) : E29 - E35
  • [5] Variation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels - An evaluation of year-to-year fluctuations
    Eastham, JA
    Riedel, E
    Scardino, PT
    Shike, M
    Fleisher, M
    Schatzkin, A
    Lanza, E
    Latkany, L
    Begg, CB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (20): : 2695 - 2700
  • [6] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [7] Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    Dikshit, Rajesh
    Eser, Sultan
    Mathers, Colin
    Rebelo, Marise
    Parkin, Donald Maxwell
    Forman, David
    Bray, Freddie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) : E359 - E386
  • [8] European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators significantly outperform the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) 2.0 in the prediction of prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study
    Foley, Robert W.
    Maweni, Robert M.
    Gorman, Laura
    Murphy, Keefe
    Lundon, Dara J.
    Durkan, Garrett
    Power, Richard
    O'Brien, Frank
    O'Malley, Kieran J.
    Galvin, David J.
    Murphy, T. Brendan
    Watson, R. William
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (05) : 706 - 713
  • [9] Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy based on patient age, digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen
    Karakiewicz, PI
    Benayoun, S
    Kattan, MW
    Perrotte, P
    Valiquette, L
    Scardino, PT
    Cagiannos, I
    Heinzer, H
    Tanguay, S
    Aprikian, AG
    Huland, H
    Graefen, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (06) : 1930 - 1934
  • [10] Kelsey JL, 1996, MONOGRAPHS EPIDEMIOL, V26