A general framework for evolutionary multiobjective optimization via manifold learning

被引:33
作者
Li, Ke [1 ]
Kwong, Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Comp Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Regularity; Principal curve; Laplacian eigenmaps; Manifold learning; Evolutionary computation; Multiobjective optimization; REDUCTION; ALGORITHMS; PROXIMITY; DIVERSITY; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.070
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Under certain mild condition, the Pareto-optimal set (PS) of a continuous multiobjective optimization problem, with m objectives, is a piece-wise continuous (m - 1)-dimensional manifold. This regularity property is important, yet has been unfortunately ignored in many evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) studies. The first work that explicitly takes advantages of this regularity property in EMO is the regularity model-based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm (RM-MEDA). However, its performance largely depends on its model parameter, which is problem dependent. Manifold learning, also known as nonlinear dimensionality reduction, is able to discover the geometric property of a low-dimensional manifold embedded in the high-dimensional ambient space. This paper presents a general framework that applies advanced manifold learning techniques in EMO. At each generation, we first use a principal curve algorithm to obtain an approximation of the PS manifold. Then, the Laplacian eigenmaps algorithm is employed to find the low-dimensional representation of this PS approximation. Afterwards, we identify the neighborhood relationship in this low-dimensional representation, which is also applicable for the original high-dimensional data. Based on the neighborhood relationship, we can interpolate new candidate solutions that obey the geometric property of the PS manifold. Empirical results validate the effectiveness of our proposal.(C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 74
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GECCO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EVOLUTIONARY ALGORIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CES487 U ESS NAN TEC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT SERIES OPERATION
[5]   Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering [J].
Arias-Montano, Alfredo ;
Coello Coello, Carlos A. ;
Mezura-Montes, Efren .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2012, 16 (05) :662-694
[6]   Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation [J].
Belkin, M ;
Niyogi, P .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2003, 15 (06) :1373-1396
[7]   The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [J].
Bosman, PAN ;
Thierens, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2003, 7 (02) :174-188
[8]  
Chen SH, 2013, IEEE PAC VIS SYMP, P153, DOI 10.1109/PacificVis.2013.6596140
[9]   A flexible three-level logistic network design considering cost and time criteria with a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm [J].
Cheshmehgaz, Hossein Rajabalipour ;
Desa, Mohamad Ishak ;
Wibowo, Antoni .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2013, 24 (02) :277-293
[10]  
Deb K., 1996, Computer Science and informatics, V26, P30