Rehospitalization after Radical Prostatectomy in a Nationwide, Population Based Study

被引:26
作者
Frioriksson, Jon Om [1 ]
Holmberg, Erik [2 ]
Adolfsson, Jan [4 ]
Lambe, Mats [5 ,7 ]
Bill-Axelson, Anna [5 ,8 ]
Carlsson, Stefan [6 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [3 ]
Stattin, Par [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Oncol, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Urol Sect, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Reg Canc Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; patient readmission; perioperative care; PATIENT OUTCOMES; HOSPITAL STAY; LENGTH; MORBIDITY; CANCER; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.109
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We investigated hospital readmission frequency during the 90 days after radical prostatectomy and assessed the readmission risk associated with potentially related variables. Materials and Methods: Using the population based, nationwide PCBaSe (Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden) we identified men diagnosed with incident prostate cancer between 2000 and 2011 who underwent radical prostatectomy as primary treatment. We used logistic regression analysis to examine the association of the risk of 90-day postoperative readmission with surgical method, calendar period, tumor risk category, hospital case load and patient characteristics. Results: During 90 postoperative days 2,317 of the 24,122 men (10%) identified were nonelectively readmitted, specifically 10% after retropubic, 9% after robot-assisted and 11% after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The range in readmission frequency among hospitals was 0% to 35%. Higher readmission risk was associated with the early calendar period (2009 to 2011 vs 2000 to 2002 OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.83), greater age (70 or greater vs less than 60 years OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), higher risk category (high vs low OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.57-2.03), high comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index 3 or greater vs 0 OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.29-2.44) and low hospital surgical volume (150 or greater vs fewer than 30 radical prostatectomies per year OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.81). Conclusions: Readmission rates after different radical prostatectomy methods were similar, ranging from 9% to 11%, with wide variation among hospitals. Readmission rates can be used as an indicator of perioperative care quality but potential confounders must be adjusted to avoid bias.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Postdischarge environmental and socioeconomic factors and the likelihood of early hospital readmission among community-dwelling medicare beneficiaries [J].
Arbaje, Alicia I. ;
Wolff, Jennifer L. ;
Yu, Qilu ;
Powe, Neil R. ;
Anderson, Gerard F. ;
Boult, Chad .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2008, 48 (04) :495-504
[2]   Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy [J].
Barocas, Daniel A. ;
Mitchell, Robert ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Cookson, Michael S. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2010, 28 (03) :243-250
[3]   Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. [J].
Begg, CB ;
Riedel, ER ;
Bach, PB ;
Kattan, MW ;
Schrag, D ;
Warren, JL ;
Scardino, PT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1138-1144
[4]   Comorbidity, Treatment and Mortality: A Population Based Cohort Study of Prostate Cancer in PCBaSe Sweden [J].
Berglund, Anders ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Tishelman, Carol ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Stattin, Paer ;
Lambe, Mats .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) :833-839
[5]   Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Bolenz, Christian ;
Gupta, Amit ;
Hotze, Timothy ;
Ho, Richard ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Roehrborn, Claus G. ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) :453-458
[6]   The Evolving Importance of Readmission Data to the Practicing Surgeon [J].
Brown, Russell E. ;
Qadan, Motaz ;
Martin, Robert C. G., II ;
Polk, Hiram C., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (04) :558-560
[7]   Nationwide population-based study on 30-day mortality after radical prostatectomy in Sweden [J].
Carlsson, Sigrid ;
Adolfsson, Jan ;
Bratt, Ola ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik ;
Ahlstrand, Christer ;
Holmberg, Erik ;
Stattin, Par ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 43 (05) :350-356
[8]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[9]   Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) [J].
Chung, Shiu-Dong ;
Kelle, Joseph J. ;
Huang, Chao-Yuan ;
Chen, Yi-Hua ;
Lin, Herng-Ching .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11C) :E966-E971
[10]   Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Menon, Mani ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1037-1063