Evaluation of potential co-benefits of air pollution control and climate mitigation policies for China's electricity sector

被引:51
作者
Wei, Xinyang [1 ]
Tong, Qing [2 ]
Magill, Iain [3 ]
Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat [3 ]
Betz, Regina [4 ]
机构
[1] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] UNSW Sydney, Ctr Energy & Environm Markets, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Energy & Environm, Sch Management & Law, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Air pollution; Greenhouse gas mitigation; Co-benefits; Electricity sector; China; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANCILLARY BENEFITS; QUALITY; US; STRATEGIES; IMPACTS; ECONOMY; MODEL; NOX;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104917
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the rapid industrialisation, local air pollution has become one of China's most important environmental issues. In consequence, increasingly stringent air pollution control policies have been established by the Chinese government. These policies will inevitably affect China's future electric power investment given the key contribution of this sector to air pollution. This sector is also a key contributor to China's greenhouse gas emissions and hence climate policy efforts. We present a study exploring what impacts of potential interactions and combinations of different policy efforts for local air pollutant control and carbon mitigation have on China's future electricity generation mix. The study utilises a novel generation portfolio model that explicitly incorporates key uncertainties in future technology costs and different policy approaches including carbon pricing and air emissions control. The findings highlight that China can achieve significant reductions for both greenhouse gas and local air pollutant emissions through a combination of climate change and air pollution control policies. Furthermore, there are potentially significant co-benefits from the perspectives of both air pollutant control and carbon mitigation and, notably, that the co-benefit from a sufficient carbon pricing policy to air pollution emission reductions is much stronger than that from stringent air pollutant control policies to carbon mitigation. Specifically, in order to achieve substantial local air pollution and greenhouse gas mitigation from China's electricity sector, it is necessary to close coal-fired power plants rather than merely seeking to clean their air pollution emissions up. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Abrell J., 2019, WORKING PAPER
[2]  
Ageea M.D., 2012, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V36, P64
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Sustain, V10, P17
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS
[6]   Integrated modelling of climate control and air pollution: Methodology and results from one-way coupling of an energy-environment-economy (E3MG) and atmospheric chemistry model (p-TOMCAT) in decarbonising scenarios for Mexico to 2050 [J].
Barker, Terry ;
Anger, Annela ;
Dessens, Olivier ;
Pollitt, Hector ;
Rogers, Helen ;
Scrieciu, Serban ;
Jones, Rod ;
Pyle, John .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (08) :661-670
[7]  
Beijing Municipal Congress, 2017, DEC STAND COMM BEIJ
[8]   The value of air pollution co-benefits of climate policies: Analysis with a global sector-trade CGE model called WorldScan [J].
Bollen, Johannes .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 :178-191
[9]  
Braathen N.A., 2012, LESSONS ENV POLICY R
[10]  
Buchsbaum M., 2018, AM COAL PLANTS CLOSI