Effectiveness of Screening With Annual Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography: Results of the Initial Screen From the Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program

被引:89
作者
Chiarelli, Anna M. [1 ,2 ]
Prummel, Maegan V. [1 ]
Muradali, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Majpruz, Vicky [1 ]
Horgan, Meaghan [1 ]
Carroll, June C. [2 ,3 ]
Eisen, Andrea [2 ,4 ]
Meschino, Wendy S. [5 ]
Shumak, Rene S. [1 ]
Warner, Ellen [2 ,4 ]
Rabeneck, Linda [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Canc Care Ontario, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[5] North York Gen Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; OVARIAN-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; WOMEN; HISTORY; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2013.52.8331
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The Ontario Breast Screening Program expanded in July 2011 to screen women age 30 to 69 years at high risk for breast cancer with annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital mammography. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first organized screening program for women at high risk for breast cancer. Patients and Methods Performance measures after assessment were compared with screening results for 2,207 women with initial screening examinations. The following criteria were used to determine eligibility: known mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or other gene predisposing to a markedly increased risk of breast cancer, untested first-degree relative of a gene mutation carrier, family history consistent with hereditary breast cancer syndrome and estimated personal lifetime breast cancer risk >= 25%, or radiation therapy to the chest (before age 30 years and at least 8 years previously). Results The recall rate was significantly higher among women who had abnormal MRI alone (15.1%; 95% CI, 13.8% to 16.4%) compared with mammogram alone (6.4%; 95% CI, 5.5% to 7.3%). Of the 35 breast cancers detected (16.3 per 1,000; 95% CI, 11.2 to 22.2), none were detected by mammogram alone, 23 (65.7%) were detected by MRI alone (10.7 per 1,000; 95% CI, 6.7 to 15.8), and 25 (71%) were detected among women who were known gene mutation carriers (30.8 per 1,000, 95% CI, 19.4 to 43.7). The positive predictive value was highest for detection based on mammogram and MRI (12.4%; 95% CI, 7.3% to 19.3%). Conclusion Screening with annual MRI combined with mammography has the potential to be effectively implemented into an organized breast screening program for women at high risk for breast cancer. This could be considered an important management option for known BRCA gene mutation carriers.
引用
收藏
页码:2224 / 2230
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[2]   The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer [J].
Antoniou, AC ;
Pharoah, PPD ;
Smith, P ;
Easton, DF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (08) :1580-1590
[3]   Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease [J].
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9291) :1389-1399
[4]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[5]   Risk of breast cancer in families of multiple affected women and men [J].
Bevier, Melanie ;
Sundquist, Kristina ;
Hemminki, Kari .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (02) :723-728
[6]  
Canadian Cancer Society Statistics Canada Public Health Agency of Canada Provincial/Territorial Cancer Registries & Public Health Agency of Canada, 2013, CAN CANC STAT 2013 S
[7]   Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990/91 to 2000 [J].
Chiarelli, AM ;
Halapy, E ;
Nadalin, V ;
Shumak, R ;
O'Malley, F ;
Mai, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (01) :34-42
[8]   Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Performance Measures in Concurrent Cohorts within an Organized Breast Screening Program [J].
Chiarelli, Anna M. ;
Edwards, Sarah A. ;
Prummel, Maegan V. ;
Muradali, Derek ;
Majpruz, Vicky ;
Done, Susan J. ;
Brown, Patrick ;
Shumak, Rene S. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) :684-693
[9]  
Claus EB, 1996, CANCER, V77, P2318, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Z