Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

被引:247
作者
Moran, Gregory J. [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Edward [3 ]
Corey, G. Ralph [4 ]
Das, Anita F. [5 ]
De Anda, Carisa [3 ]
Prokocimer, Philippe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis Olive View, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Cubist Pharmaceut, Clin Dev, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[5] InClin, Biometr, Los Altos, CA USA
关键词
SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS; IN-VITRO ACTIVITY; COMPLICATED SKIN; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; PHOSPHATE TR-701; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PRODRUG TR-701; MRSA SKIN; OXAZOLIDINONE; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70737-6
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background New antibiotics are needed to treat infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Tedizolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial drug designed to provide enhanced activity against Gram-positive pathogens. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous to oral tedizolid for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. Methods ESTABLISH-2 was a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done between Sept 28, 2011, and Jan 10, 2013, at 58 centres in nine countries. Patients (aged >= 12 years) with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (cellulitis or erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, or wound infection) that had a minimum lesion area of 75 cm(2) and were suspected or documented to be associated with a Gram-positive pathogen, were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive voice-response system with block randomisation, to receive intravenous once-daily tedizolid (200 mg for 6 days) or twice-daily linezolid (600 mg for 10 days), with optional oral step-down. Randomisation was stratified by geographic region and type of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection. The primary endpoint was early clinical response (>= 20% reduction in lesion area at 48-72 h compared with baseline), with a non-inferiority margin of -10%. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01421511. Findings 666 patients were randomly assigned to receive tedizolid (n=332) or linezolid (n=334). 283 (85%) patients in the tedizolid group and 276 (83%) in the linezolid group achieved early clinical response (difference 2.6%, 95% CI -3.0 to 8.2), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Gastrointestinal adverse events were less frequent with tedizolid than linezolid, taking place in 52 (16%) of 331 patients and 67 (20%) of 327 patients in the safety population. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported by one (<1%) patient in the tedizolid group and four (1%) patients in the linezolid group. Interpretation Intravenous to oral once-daily tedizolid 200 mg for 6 days was non-inferior to twice-daily linezolid 600 mg for 10 days for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. Tedizolid could become a useful option for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in the hospital and outpatient settings.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [31] US Food and Drug Administration, 2013, Guidance for industry: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment
  • [32] Epidemiology and Outcomes of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Hospitalized Patients
    Zervos, Marcus J.
    Freeman, Katherine
    Vo, Lien
    Haque, Nadia
    Pokharna, Hiren
    Raut, Monika
    Kim, Myoung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (02) : 238 - 245