Freedom of silence vs. freedom of speech: Technology, law and information security

被引:2
作者
Hoanca, Bogdan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/MTAS.2006.1700017
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Privacy is the ability to control the transfer of information both in and out, through an imaginary border between the private space and the public space. Freedom of silence, as a facet of privacy, is the ability of an individual to stop unwanted speech, telephone calls, emails, or any other face-to-face or mediated forms of communication. Two recent legal measures namely the National Do Not Call List (DNCL) and the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM), both designed to enforce the freedom of silence, have been found to have a relatively low efficacy. As such, a number of technologies have been developed to protect the freedom of silence. Technology-based solutions are the most effective means to limit the inflow of information rather than legally shaped. These technologies are not as slow-moving as the legal framework but are quick and adaptive reactions to other technologies. The slower moving legal system is best used as a support for the filtering technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*ANT WORK GROUP, WHAT IS PHISH PHARM
[2]  
AUFRECHT SE, 1977, THESIS U SO CALIFORN
[3]  
BELINFANTE A, 2005, TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBER
[4]  
BOUTIN P, 2003, OFFER YOU CAN REFUSE
[5]  
Brandeis L., 1890, HARVARD LAW REV, V4, P193, DOI DOI 10.2307/1321160
[6]  
BRENNER S. W., 2002, Journal of Technology Law & Policy, V7, P123
[7]  
BUTLER S, 2004, BILLBOARD, V116, P22
[8]  
CATE FH, FREEDOM FORUM
[9]  
*CERT CARN MELL SO, DEN SERV ATT
[10]  
*CNET STAFF, 2005, CNET REV 0719