Reframing Global Palliative Care Advocacy for the Sustainable Development Goal Era: A Qualitative Study of the Views of International Palliative Care Experts

被引:19
作者
Clark, Joseph [1 ]
Barnes, Amy [2 ]
Gardiner, Clare [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sect Publ Hlth, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Palliative care; public health; universal health coverage; sustainable development goals; advocacy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. The World Health Assembly Palliative Care Resolution in 2014 and the inclusion of palliative care within the sustainable development goals raised optimism that palliative care would no longer be a peripheral aspect of global health. However, no funding, accountability measures, or indicators for palliative care development accompanied these policy developments. This risks health actors continuing to prioritize the attainment of better known target-driven aspects of health care. Objectives. To explore the attitudes of international palliative care experts regarding how the future development of palliative care can be accelerated. Methods. About 16 international palliative care experts were interviewed for their epistemic expertise. Participants were interviewed face to face or via Skype. Interviews were recorded, transcribed nonverbatim, and analyzed using a thematic approach (NVivo). Results. Participants strongly supported the rollout of national palliative care policies around the world for two reasons: to ensure palliative care attracts national funding streams and to attract global funding for palliative care. The absence of a global indicator for palliative care development was considered a severe impediment to the inclusion of palliative care within global efforts toward universal health care. Advocacy partnerships, using human rights approaches with economic frames, were considered the most effective methods of influencing policymakers. Conclusion. Palliative care represents a value proposition that is not currently being maximized by advocacy. Advocates should consider palliative care developmentally, focusing on key asks for development and consider how palliative care can contribute to other international development priorities, in particular poverty reduction. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 370
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   What is the value of palliative care provision in low-resource settings? [J].
Anderson, R. Eleanor ;
Grant, Liz .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 2 (01)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Global atlas of palliative care at the end of life
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WHO DEF PALL CAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, STRENGTH PALL CAR CO
[5]  
[Anonymous], RES BAS FIN HLTH
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STOP GLOB EP CHRON D
[7]   First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing [J].
Bailey, Julia .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (02) :127-131
[8]   What can global health institutions do to help strengthen health systems in low income countries? [J].
Balabanova, Dina ;
McKee, Martin ;
Mills, Anne ;
Walt, Gill ;
Haines, Andy .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 8
[9]   Regulation of opioid prescribing [J].
Ballantyne, Jane C. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7598) :811-812
[10]   Palliative care as an International human right [J].
Brennan, Frank .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 33 (05) :494-499