Sedation in the intensive care unit - A systematic review

被引:263
|
作者
Ostermann, ME
Keenan, SP
Seiferling, RA
Sibbald, WJ
机构
[1] St Pauls Hosp, Ctr Hlth Evaluat & Outcome Sci, Vancouver, BC V6M 2N8, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med, Div Crit Care, London, ON, Canada
[3] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Richard Ivey Crit Care Trauma Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharm, London, ON, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.283.11.1451
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Sedation has become an integral part of critical care practice in minimizing patient discomfort; however, sedatives have adverse effects and the potential to prolong mechanical ventilation, which may increase health care costs. Objective To determine which form of sedation is associated with optimal sedation, the shortest time to extubation, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Data Sources A key word search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration databases and hand searches of 6 anesthesiology journals from 1980 to June 1998. Experts and industry representatives were contacted, personal files were searched, and reference lists of relevant primary and review articles were reviewed. Study Selection Studies included were randomized controlled trials enrolling adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring short-term or long-term sedation. At least 2 sedative agents had to be compared and the quality of sedation, time to extubation, or length of ICU stay analyzed. Data Extraction Data on population, intervention, outcome, and methodological quality were extracted in duplicate by 2 of 3 investigators using 8 validity criteria. Data Synthesis Of 49 identified randomized controlled trials, 32 met our selection criteria; 20 studied short-term sedation and 14, long-term sedation. Of these, 20 compared propofol with midazolam. Most trials were not double-blind and did not report or standardize important cointerventions. Propofol provides at least as effective sedation as midazolam and results in a faster time to extubation, with an increased risk of hypotension and higher cost. Insufficient data exist to determine effect on length of stay in the ICU. Isoflurane demonstrated some advantages over midazolam, and ketamine had a more favorable hemodynamic profile than fentanyl in patients with head injuries. Conclusion Considering the widespread use of sedation for critically ill patients, more large, high-quality, randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of different agents for short-term and long-term sedation are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1459
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Ha Yeon
    Lee, Ja Eun
    Kim, Ha Yan
    Kim, Jeongmin
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (49)
  • [2] Sedation in intensive care unit
    Akrout, Maha Touaibia
    Laatar, Chahir
    Chanques, Gerald
    ANESTHESIE & REANIMATION, 2022, 8 (04): : 414 - 420
  • [3] Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit
    Valerie Page
    Cathy McKenzie
    Current Anesthesiology Reports, 2021, 11 : 92 - 100
  • [4] Sedation in the intensive care unit
    Young, C
    Knudsen, N
    Hilton, A
    Reves, JG
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (03) : 854 - 866
  • [5] Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit
    Page, Valerie
    McKenzie, Cathy
    CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 11 (02) : 92 - 100
  • [6] Sedation in the intensive care unit
    Hurford, WE
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1999, 37 (04) : 113 - 122
  • [7] Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit
    McGrane, S.
    Pandharipande, P. P.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2012, 78 (03) : 369 - 380
  • [8] Sedation in intensive care unit
    Kogler, V. Majeric
    NEUROLOGIA CROATICA, 2002, 51 : 5 - 10
  • [9] Sedation in the intensive care unit
    Rowe, Katherine
    Fletcher, Simon
    BJA EDUCATION, 2008, 8 (02) : 50 - 55
  • [10] Efficacy of sedation regimens to facilitate mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit: A systematic review
    Hartman, Mary E.
    McCrory, Douglas C.
    Schulman, Scott R.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (02) : 246 - 255