共 50 条
PTFE Bypass or Thrupass for Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion? A Randomised Controlled Trial
被引:36
|作者:
Lepantalo, M.
[1
]
Laurila, K.
[1
]
Roth, W. -D.
[1
]
Rossi, P.
[1
]
Lavonen, J.
[1
]
Makinen, K.
[1
]
Manninen, H.
[1
]
Romsi, P.
[1
]
Perala, J.
[1
]
Bergqvist, D.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
关键词:
Superficial femoral artery;
Occlusion;
Bypass;
Thrupass;
Covered stent;
Endograft;
STENT-GRAFTS;
FEMOROPOPLITEAL BYPASS;
LESIONS;
POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE;
EFFICACY;
REVASCULARIZATION;
DISEASE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.01.003
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Early results of a thrupass endograft in the treatment of femoral lesions are promising. Less morbidity and better cost-effectiveness are suggested to be achieved in the treatment of chronic lower limb ischaemia with endovascular treatment compared to surgical treatment. Patients and methods: This randomised multicentre trial aimed to enroll a group of 60 + 60 patients for the treatment of 5-25-cm occlusions of superficial femoral artery (SFA) to be followed up for 3 years. Patients were treated either with endoluminal PTFE thrupass (WL Gore & Ass) or with surgical polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass to proximal popliteal artery. Primary patency at 3 years was scheduled to be the primary end-point and secondary patency, functional success, costs and quality of life the secondary end-points. Results: A sample of 100 consecutive SFA occlusions in one of the centres revealed that only 4% of the lesions were amenable for the study. The trial was prematurely terminated due to the results of an interim analysis at the time when 44 patients were recruited: the 1-year primary patency (excluding technical failures) was 48% for thrupass and 95% for bypass (p = 0.02). The patency difference in favour of surgical bypass over endovascular thrupass was also sustained after completion of 1-year follow-up, the primary patencies being 46% and 84% at 1 year with grossly equilinear life-table curves thereafter (p = 0.18), respectively. The corresponding secondary patencies were 63% and 100% (p = 0.05) when excluding technical failures and 58% and 100% (p = 0.02) according to intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were thus not analysed. Conclusion: Treatment of SFA occlusions (TASC IIB and C or Imelda la and II) should be done by PTFE bypass rather than by PTFE thrupass, as thrupass is connected with worse early outcome. These results represent only a small category of femoral disease. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 584
页数:7
相关论文