Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database

被引:44
作者
Harboe, Kirstine Moll [1 ]
Anthonsen, Kristian [2 ]
Bardram, Linda [3 ]
机构
[1] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Glostrup Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Surg Gastroenterol C, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
administrative data; clinical database; cholecystectomy; quality indicators; validation; BILE-DUCT INJURIES; LENGTH-OF-STAY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; EARLY READMISSION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; QUALITY INDICATOR; CARE; SURGERY; REOPERATIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzp009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In The Danish Cholecystectomy Database (DCD), quality indicators are derived from clinical data in combination with administrative data from the National Patient Registry. The indicators 'Length of postoperative stay <= 1 day and no readmission', 'Length of stay (LOS) > 3 days and/or readmission', 'Additional procedures within 30 days', 'Reconstructive bile duct surgery', 'Other surgery of the bile duct' and 'Death within 30 days' are all derived from administrative data. This study investigates the validity of the administrative data and evaluates the association between these indicators and postoperative complications. Data from 1360 medical records of patients undergoing cholecystectomy were compared with the relevant administrative data from the National Patient Registry. The medical records served as the 'gold standard'. The association between the individual indicators and the occurrence of a postoperative complication was assessed. Validation of administrative data against the gold standard was done by the calculation of per cent agreement (including kappa-values) sensitivity/specificity and predictive values. The association between indicators and complications was analysed with crude event rates and odds ratios. The validity of the administrative data was excellent (97.1-100% agreement, kappa = 0.73-1.00). All of the indicators except 'Other bile duct surgery' were significantly associated with postoperative complications. A subdivision of some indicators strengthened the associations. The DCD is a valid method for monitoring the quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 168
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Adamsen S, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V184, P571
[2]  
AINSWORTH AP, 2003, UGESKRIFT LAEGER, V167, P2648
[3]   A conceptual framework for the study of early readmission as an indicator of quality of care [J].
Ashton, CM ;
Wray, NP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1996, 43 (11) :1533-1541
[4]   The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission - A meta-analysis of the evidence [J].
Ashton, CM ;
DelJunco, DJ ;
Souchek, J ;
Wray, NP ;
Mansyur, CL .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (10) :1044-1059
[5]  
Bardram Linda, 2005, Ugeskr Laeger, V167, P2618
[6]   Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care -: Advantages and limitations [J].
Benbassat, J ;
Taragin, M .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (08) :1074-1081
[7]   Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Hamby, LS ;
Birkmeyer, CM ;
Decker, MV ;
Karon, NM ;
Dow, RW .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (04) :405-409
[8]   Length of stay - An appropriate quality measure? Discussion [J].
Smith, Stephen ;
Brasel, Karen J. ;
Hoyt, David B. ;
Petersen, Scott R. ;
Talamonti, Mark ;
Jurkovich, Gregory J. ;
Low, Donald E. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (05) :465-466
[9]  
Cohen MM, 1996, CAN MED ASSOC J, V154, P491
[10]   Using control charts to monitor quality of hospital care with administrative data [J].
Coory, Michael ;
Duckett, Stephen ;
Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (01) :31-39