Effective acceptance conditions in real-time automated negotiation

被引:23
作者
Baarslag, Tim [1 ]
Hindriks, Koen [1 ]
Jonker, Catholijn [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Interact Intelligence Grp, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Automated negotiation; Real-time bilateral negotiation; Acceptance criteria; Acceptance conditions; When to accept; RATIONAL AGENTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.021
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In every negotiation with a deadline, one of the negotiating parties must accept an offer to avoid a break off. As a break off is usually an undesirable outcome for both parties, it is important that a negotiator employs a proficient mechanism to decide under which conditions to accept. When designing such conditions, one is faced with the acceptance dilemma: accepting the current offer may be suboptimal, as better offers may still be presented before time runs out. On the other hand, accepting too late may prevent an agreement from being reached, resulting in a break off with no gain for either party. Motivated by the challenges of bilateral negotiations between automated agents and by the results and insights of the automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC), we classify and compare state-of-the-art generic acceptance conditions. We perform extensive experiments to compare the performance of various acceptance conditions in combination with a broad range of bidding strategies and negotiation scenarios. Furthermore we propose new acceptance conditions and we demonstrate that they outperform the other conditions. We also provide insight into why some conditions work better than others and investigate correlations between the properties of the negotiation scenario and the efficacy of acceptance conditions. 0 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 77
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] An B, 2012, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V383, P145
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, CENT EUR J OPER RES
  • [3] Aumann R. J., 1992, HDB GAME THEORY EC A, V1
  • [4] Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition
    Baarslag, Tim
    Fujita, Katsuhide
    Gerding, Enrico H.
    Hindriks, Koen
    Ito, Takayuki
    Jennings, Nicholas R.
    Jonker, Catholijn
    Kraus, Sarit
    Lin, Raz
    Robu, Valentin
    Williams, Colin R.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 198 : 73 - 103
  • [5] Baarslag T, 2013, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V435, P95
  • [6] Baarslag T, 2012, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V383, P113
  • [7] Intelligent agents for e-marketplace: Negotiation with issue trade-offs by fuzzy inference systems
    Cheng, Chi-Bin
    Chan, Chu-Chai Henry
    Lin, Kun-Cheng
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (02) : 626 - 638
  • [8] Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents
    Faratin, P
    Sierra, C
    Jennings, NR
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 1998, 24 (3-4) : 159 - 182
  • [9] Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations
    Faratin, P
    Sierra, C
    Jennings, NR
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 142 (02) : 205 - 237
  • [10] Fatima S. S., 2002, Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, P143