Redundant trials can be prevented, if the EU clinical trial regulation is applied duly

被引:13
作者
Kim, Daria [1 ]
Hasford, Joerg [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Innovat & Competit, Marstallpl 1, D-81545 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Med Informat Proc Biometry & Epidemiol, Scharnitzerstasse 7, D-82166 Grafelfing, Germany
[3] Permanent Working Party Res Eth Comm Germany, Scharnitzerstasse 7, D-82166 Grafelfing, Germany
关键词
Clinical trials; EU clinical trials regulation; Research ethics; Research ethics committees; Research redundancy; Systematic review; Trial authorisation; Trial methodology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; INCREASING VALUE; REDUCING WASTE; ETHICS COMMITTEES; CARDIAC-SURGERY; EQUIPOISE; DESIGN; METAANALYSES; APROTININ;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-020-00536-9
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The problem of wasteful clinical trials has been debated relentlessly in the medical community. To a significant extent, it is attributed to redundant trials - studies that are carried out to address questions, which can be answered satisfactorily on the basis of existing knowledge and accessible evidence from prior research. This article presents the first evaluation of the potential of the EU Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, which entered into force in 2014 but is expected to become applicable at the end of 2021, to prevent such trials. Having reviewed provisions related to the trial authorisation, we propose how certain regulatory requirements for the assessment of trial applications can and should be interpreted and applied by national research ethics committees and other relevant authorities in order to avoid redundant trials and, most importantly, preclude the unnecessary recruitment of trial participants and their unjustified exposure to health risks.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2020) PRISMA guidelines
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, PHARM SECTOR INQUIRY
  • [3] [Anonymous], International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1964, WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, BMJ
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1996, INT C HARMONISATION
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, GUID RES ETH COMM ME
  • [8] Augoustides JG, 2005, CLIN TRIALS, V2, P231
  • [9] Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
    Bastian, Hilda
    Glasziou, Paul
    Chalmers, Iain
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (09):
  • [10] Systematic reviews as a tool for planning and interpreting trials
    Bath, Philip M. W.
    Gray, Laura J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2009, 4 (01) : 23 - 27