Electrodes for Multifocal Electroretinography (mfERG): A Comparison of Four Electrodes Types

被引:0
作者
Mohidin, Norhani [1 ]
Yap, Maurice K. H. [2 ]
Jacobs, Robert J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Healthcare Sci, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Optometry, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
来源
SAINS MALAYSIANA | 2014年 / 43卷 / 07期
关键词
Carbon fiber electrode; DTL thread electrode; gold foil electrode; JET contact lens electrode; multifocal electroretinography; VERIS; GOLD FOIL; CLINICAL ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; CORNEAL ELECTRODE; BURIAN-ALLEN; POTENTIALS; JET; DTL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of four different electrode types in detecting the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) using the visual evoked response imaging system (VERIS). Multifocal ERG of 30 healthy subjects aged 17-50 years was recorded. Four different types of electrodes were used (JET contact lens, gold foil, DTL thread and c-glide carbon fiber electrodes) and the trough to peak amplitude response densities of the first order kernels (which approximated to the a and b wave of the full field electroretinogram) were compared. The JET contact lens electrode produced the highest amplitude response which was significantly different from the gold foil, DTL thread and the c-glide electrodes, but there was no significant difference between the gold foil and DTL or between DTL and the c-glide electrodes. In conclusion, contact lens electrode produced the highest response density followed by the gold foil and the DTL thread. There was no significant difference in amplitude response between the gold foil and DTL thread, therefore these two electrodes provide for viable alternatives for recording mfERG especially when there are concerns that contact lens electrode may be uncomfortable for recording periods that may take a long time.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1094
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ARDEN GB, 1979, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V18, P421
[2]  
Armington J.C, 1974, ELECTRORETINOGRAM, P85
[3]  
Bearse Jr M.A, 1995, VISION SCI ITS APPL, V1, P318
[4]   Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes [J].
Beeler, P. ;
Barthelmes, D. ;
Sutter, F. K. ;
Helbig, H. ;
Helbig, H. ;
Fleischhauer, J. C. .
KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2007, 224 (04) :265-268
[5]   CORNEAL ELECTRODE FOR PATTERNED STIMULUS ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY [J].
BLOOM, BH ;
SOKOL, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1977, 83 (02) :272-275
[6]   A SPECULUM CONTACT LENS ELECTRODE FOR ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY [J].
BURIAN, HM ;
ALLEN, L .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1954, 6 (03) :509-511
[7]   RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR ELECTRORETINOGRAMS AND VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS - REPORT OF AN IFCN COMMITTEE [J].
CELESIA, GG ;
BODISWOLLNER, I ;
CHATRIAN, GE ;
HARDING, GFA ;
SOKOL, S ;
SPEKREIJSE, H .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 87 (06) :421-436
[8]  
CHASE WW, 1976, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V53, P668
[9]  
DAWSON WW, 1979, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V18, P988
[10]   A COMPARISON OF FLASH ELECTRORETINOGRAMS RECORDED FROM BURIAN ALLEN, JET, C-GLIDE, GOLD FOIL, DTL AND SKIN ELECTRODES [J].
ESAKOWITZ, L ;
KRISS, A ;
SHAWKAT, F .
EYE, 1993, 7 :169-171