Projecting the Competition between Energy-Storage Technologies in the Electricity Sector

被引:66
作者
Beuse, Martin [1 ]
Steffen, Bjarne [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, Tobias S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Energy Polit Grp, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Sci Technol & Policy, Univ Str 41, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
LI-ION BATTERIES; LITHIUM-ION; LEVELIZED COST; POLICIES; FUTURE; WIND; PROSPECTS; SYSTEMS; PACKS; SOLAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.017
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Low-cost electricity-storage technologies (ESTs) enable rapid decarbonization of energy systems. However, current EST cost estimates lack meaningful models to assess alternative market and technology scenarios. Here, we project the competition between six ESTs until 2030 and derive cost benchmarks. To this end, a system-dynamic simulation model operationalizes technology costs using component-based experience curves with cost floors for battery materials. We find that lithium-ion batteries are likely to outcompete alternative ESTs by 2030 across applications and largely independent of selected scenarios. This dominance can pose risks associated with technological lock-in. We, therefore, analyze different policy options and contend that it seems most promising to combine: (1) the support for development and commercialization of breakthrough storage concepts and (2) piggybacking on the strong improvement dynamics in lithium-ion batteries by fostering technology and knowledge spillovers that benefit the development of alternative active materials; battery designs; and adjacent, non-lithium-based technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2162 / 2184
页数:23
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
ABERNATHY WJ, 1978, TECHNOL REV, V80, P40
[2]   The future costs of nuclear power using multiple expert elicitations: effects of RD&D and elicitation design [J].
Anadon, Laura Diaz ;
Nemet, Gregory ;
Verdolini, Elena .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03)
[3]   Future generations of cathode materials: an automotive industry perspective [J].
Andre, Dave ;
Kim, Sung-Jin ;
Lamp, Peter ;
Lux, Simon Franz ;
Maglia, Filippo ;
Paschos, Odysseas ;
Stiaszny, Barbara .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A, 2015, 3 (13) :6709-6732
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Z. Energiewirtsch, DOI [10.1007/s12398-012-0080-6, DOI 10.1007/S12398-012-0080-6]
[5]  
ARPA-E, 2010, GRIDS PROGRAM OVERVI
[6]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[7]  
Azevedo Marcelo., 2018, LITHIUM COBALT TALE
[8]   Battery technology for electric and hybrid vehicles: Expert views about prospects for advancement [J].
Baker, Erin ;
Chon, Haewon ;
Keisler, Jeffrey .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2010, 77 (07) :1139-1146
[9]   Cost-efficient demand-pull policies for multi-purpose technologies - The case of stationary electricity storage [J].
Battke, Benedikt ;
Schmidt, Tobias S. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 155 :334-348
[10]   A review and probabilistic model of lifecycle costs of stationary batteries in multiple applications [J].
Battke, Benedikt ;
Schmidt, Tobias S. ;
Grosspietsch, David ;
Hoffmann, Volker H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 25 :240-250