Effect of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program on Children's Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

被引:37
作者
Ridberg, Ronit A. [1 ,2 ]
Bell, Janice F. [1 ]
Merritt, Kathryn E. [3 ]
Harris, Diane M. [4 ]
Young, Heather M. [1 ]
Tancredi, Daniel J. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Betty Irene Moore Sch Nursing, 2450 48th St, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Healthcare Policy & Res, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Wholesome Wave, Berkeley, CA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Nutr Phys Act & Obes, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Pediat, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
来源
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE | 2019年 / 16卷
关键词
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; FARMERS MARKET; PARTICIPANTS; PURCHASES; INFANTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.5888/pcd16.180555
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Most children in families with low income do not meet dietary guidance on fruit and vegetable consumption. Fruit and vegetable prescription programs improve access to and affordability of health-supporting foods for adults, but their effect on dietary behavior among children is not known. The objective of this study was to describe the extent to which exposure to a fruit and vegetable prescription program was associated with changes in consumption among participants aged 2 to 18. Methods We used data from a modified National Cancer Institute screener to calculate fruit and vegetable intake among 883 children who were overweight or had obesity and participated in a 4- to 6-month fruit and vegetable prescription program at federally qualified health centers during 4 years (2012-2015). Secondary analyses in 2017 included paired t tests to compare change in fruit and vegetable consumption (cups/day) between first and last visits and multivariable linear regressions, including propensity dose-adjusted models, to model this change as a function of sociodemographic and program-specific covariates, such as number of clinical visits and value of prescription redemption. Results We found a dose propensity-adjusted increase of 0.32 cups (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.45 cups) for each additional visit while holding constant the predicted number of visits and site. An equal portion of the change-score increase was attributed to vegetable consumption and fruit consumption (beta = 0.16 for each). Conclusion Fruit and vegetable prescription programs in clinical settings may increase fruit and vegetable consumption among children in low-income households. Future research should use a comparison group and consider including qualitative analysis of site-specific barriers and facilitators to success.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Incentivizing fruit and vegetable purchases among participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children
    Andreyeva, Tatiana
    Luedicke, Joerg
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2015, 18 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [2] [Anonymous], US DIET INT FOOD INT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, The health literacy of America's adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, DIETARY GUIDELINES A
  • [5] Blondin K, 2016, REV EVIDENCE HLTH PR
  • [6] Bryce Richard, 2017, Prev Med Rep, V7, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.006
  • [7] Food-frequency questionnaires: a review of their design, validation and utilisation
    Cade, JE
    Burley, VJ
    Warm, DL
    Thompson, RL
    Margetts, BM
    [J]. NUTRITION RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2004, 17 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [8] Veggie Rx: an outcome evaluation of a healthy food incentive programme
    Cavanagh, Michelle
    Jurkowski, Janine
    Bozlak, Christine
    Hastings, Julia
    Klein, Amy
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2017, 20 (14) : 2636 - 2641
  • [9] Determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in low-income children and adolescents
    Di Noia, Jennifer
    Byrd-Bredbenner, Carol
    [J]. NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2014, 72 (09) : 575 - 590
  • [10] Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y
    Evans, Charlotte E. L.
    Christian, Meaghan S.
    Cleghorn, Christine L.
    Greenwood, Darren C.
    Cade, Janet E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2012, 96 (04) : 889 - 901