The Timed Up & Go test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women

被引:7
|
作者
Christensen, Lene [1 ]
Vollestad, Nina K. [1 ]
Veierod, Marit B. [2 ]
Stuge, Britt [3 ]
Cabri, Jan [4 ]
Robinson, Hilde Stendal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Dept Interdisciplinary Hlth Sci, Forskningsveien 3A, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Sognsvannsveien 9, N-0372 Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Dept Phys Performance, Sognsveien 220, N-0863 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Active straight leg raise test; Load transfer through the pelvis; Pain intensity; Weight-bearing physical performance-based measure; STRAIGHT LEG RAISE; KNEE-OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; LUMBOPELVIC PAIN; WALK TEST; PERFORMANCE; GAIT; HYPERMOBILITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, a standardized functional mobility test, has been proposed as a physical performance-based measure in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP). Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate physical function by the use of TUG in pregnant women with PGP compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women, and to identify factors associated with increased TUG. Methods: In total, 25 pregnant women with PGP, 24 asymptomatic pregnant and 25 asymptomatic non-pregnant women participated. One-way analysis of variance was used to explore difference in TUG between the groups and multiple linear regression analyses to explore associations between TUG and potential explanatory variables. Results: The time on TUG varied among pregnant women with PGP, and was significantly higher (mean (95% CI) 6.9 (6.5, 7.3) seconds) than for asymptomatic pregnant (5.8 (5.5, 6.0), p < 0.001) and non-pregnant (5.5 (5.4, 5.6), p < 0.001) women. In the total study sample, group, increased BMI and sick leave were significantly associated with increased TUG (p-values <= 0.02). In pregnant women with PGP, pain intensity was the only significant clinical factor associated with increased TUG (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Pregnant women with PGP used longer time and showed larger variation in TUG than asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women, this underpins that TUG targets activities relevant to PGP. Our results provide new knowledge about factors influencing TUG time. Importantly, multivariable analyses suggest that pain intensity should be considered when interpreting TUG time in pregnant women with PGP.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 116
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Food behaviour in pregnant and non-pregnant diabetic women
    El Morjane, N.
    Radi, L.
    Chadli, A.
    El Ghomari, H.
    Farouqi, A.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2008, 34 : A77 - A78
  • [22] PERIURETHRAL AEROBIC MICROFLORA OF PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN
    BOLLGREN, I
    VACLAVINKOVA, V
    HURVELL, B
    BERGQVIST, G
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 1 (6123): : 1314 - 1317
  • [23] The distribution of estrogens in the blood of pregnant and non-pregnant women
    Albrieux, AS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1941, 1 (11): : 893 - 894
  • [24] PROTEIN-UTILIZATION IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN
    APPEL, J
    KING, JC
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1979, 38 (03) : 388 - 388
  • [25] Dietary behaviour of pregnant versus non-pregnant women
    Verbeke, Wim
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    APPETITE, 2007, 48 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [26] INCIDENCE OF YEASTS IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN IN NIGERIA
    GUGNANI, HC
    NZELIBE, FK
    GINI, PC
    CHUKUDEBELU, WO
    NJOKUOBI, ANU
    MYCOSES, 1989, 32 (03) : 131 - 135
  • [27] Comparison of Sexual Functions in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women
    Aydin, Mustafa
    Cayonu, Neyal
    Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa
    Irkilata, Lokman
    Atilla, Mustafa Kemal
    Kendirici, Muammer
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (05) : 2339 - 2344
  • [28] Patent foramen ovale in pregnant and non-pregnant women
    Coccheri, S.
    Limoni, P.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2011, 127 : S132 - S133
  • [29] Eating habits of pregnant and non-pregnant women: are there differences?
    Gomes, Caroline de Barros
    Malta, Maira Barreto
    de Almeida Martiniano, Ana Carolina
    Di Bonifacio, Luiza Pereira
    de Barros Leite Carvalhaes, Maria Antonieta
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2015, 37 (07): : 325 - 332
  • [30] Population pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in non-pregnant and pregnant women
    Pillai, Venkateswaran C.
    Han, Kelong
    Beigi, Richard H.
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Clark, Shannon
    Hebert, Mary F.
    Easterling, Thomas R.
    Zajicek, Anne
    Ren, Zhaoxia
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Venkataramanan, Raman
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 80 (05) : 1042 - 1050