The Timed Up & Go test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women

被引:7
|
作者
Christensen, Lene [1 ]
Vollestad, Nina K. [1 ]
Veierod, Marit B. [2 ]
Stuge, Britt [3 ]
Cabri, Jan [4 ]
Robinson, Hilde Stendal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Dept Interdisciplinary Hlth Sci, Forskningsveien 3A, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Sognsvannsveien 9, N-0372 Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Dept Phys Performance, Sognsveien 220, N-0863 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Active straight leg raise test; Load transfer through the pelvis; Pain intensity; Weight-bearing physical performance-based measure; STRAIGHT LEG RAISE; KNEE-OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; LUMBOPELVIC PAIN; WALK TEST; PERFORMANCE; GAIT; HYPERMOBILITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, a standardized functional mobility test, has been proposed as a physical performance-based measure in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP). Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate physical function by the use of TUG in pregnant women with PGP compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women, and to identify factors associated with increased TUG. Methods: In total, 25 pregnant women with PGP, 24 asymptomatic pregnant and 25 asymptomatic non-pregnant women participated. One-way analysis of variance was used to explore difference in TUG between the groups and multiple linear regression analyses to explore associations between TUG and potential explanatory variables. Results: The time on TUG varied among pregnant women with PGP, and was significantly higher (mean (95% CI) 6.9 (6.5, 7.3) seconds) than for asymptomatic pregnant (5.8 (5.5, 6.0), p < 0.001) and non-pregnant (5.5 (5.4, 5.6), p < 0.001) women. In the total study sample, group, increased BMI and sick leave were significantly associated with increased TUG (p-values <= 0.02). In pregnant women with PGP, pain intensity was the only significant clinical factor associated with increased TUG (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Pregnant women with PGP used longer time and showed larger variation in TUG than asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women, this underpins that TUG targets activities relevant to PGP. Our results provide new knowledge about factors influencing TUG time. Importantly, multivariable analyses suggest that pain intensity should be considered when interpreting TUG time in pregnant women with PGP.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 116
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during the Stork test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women
    Christensen, Lene
    Vollestad, Nina K.
    Veierod, Marit B.
    Jakobsen, Vidar E.
    Stuge, Britt
    Bakke, Eva S.
    Cabri, Jan
    Robinson, Hilde Stendal
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 80
  • [2] Kinematic and spatiotemporal gait characteristics in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women
    Christensen, Lene
    Veierod, Marit B.
    Vollestad, Nina K.
    Jakobsen, Vidar E.
    Stuge, Britt
    Cabri, Jan
    Robinson, Hilde Stendal
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 68 : 45 - 52
  • [3] Reliability of the Timed Up and Go test and Ten-Metre Timed Walk Test in Pregnant Women with Pelvic Girdle Pain
    Evensen, Natalie M.
    Kvale, Alice
    Braekken, Ingeborg H.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 20 (03) : 158 - 165
  • [4] Convergent validity of the Timed Up and Go Test and Ten-metre Timed Walk Test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain
    Evensen, Natalie Michelle
    Kvale, Alice
    Braekken, Ingeborg Hoff
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2016, 21 : 94 - 99
  • [5] Increased podocyturia in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women
    Furuta, Itsuko
    Zhai, Tianyue
    Umazume, Takeshi
    Ishikawa, Satoshi
    Nakagawa, Kinuko
    Akaishi, Rina
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Morikawa, Mamoru
    Minakami, Hisanori
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (05) : 873 - 879
  • [6] INSULIN DISAPPEARANCE RATE IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN, AND IN NON-PREGNANT WOMEN GIVEN GHRIH
    LIND, T
    BELL, S
    GILMORE, E
    HUISJES, HJ
    SCHALLY, AV
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1977, 7 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [7] Variation in the Urinary Microbiome of Pregnant Women Compared to Non-Pregnant Controls
    Thomas-White, Krystal J.
    Waters, Thaddeus P.
    Jacobs, Kristin M.
    Grayczyk, James
    Hilt, Evann E.
    Goodman, Jean R.
    Wolfe, Alan J.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 23 : 120A - 120A
  • [8] METABOLISM OF OXYTOCIN IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN
    RYDEN, G
    SJOHOLM, I
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1971, 50 : 37 - &
  • [9] PHARMACOKINETICS OF CLORAZEPATE IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN
    REY, E
    DTHIS, P
    GIRAUX, P
    LAUTURE, DD
    TURQUAIS, JM
    CHAVINIE, J
    OLIVE, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1979, 15 (03) : 175 - 180
  • [10] FLUORIDE BALANCE IN PREGNANT AND NON-PREGNANT WOMEN
    MAHESHWARI, UR
    HODGE, HC
    NEWBRUN, E
    MARGEN, S
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1980, 39 (03) : 614 - 614