Carbon Footprint Assessment of Construction Waste Packaging Using the Package-to-Product Indicator

被引:1
作者
Pesta, Jan [1 ]
Seresova, Marketa [1 ]
Koci, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chem & Technol Prague, Fac Environm Technol, Dept Environm Chem, Tech 5, Prague 16628, Czech Republic
关键词
carbon footprint; life cycle assessment; package-to-product; construction waste; environmental assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; WOOD;
D O I
10.3390/su122310094
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental impacts of buildings are based on the construction products, which together with their packaging can be assessed as one product system. To reduce the environmental impacts of buildings, the products and their packaging need to be optimised and analysed using environmental assessment. The purpose of this study is to assess the packaging related to the product according to the Life Cycle Assessment method. The environmental assessment was performed using the Product Environmental Footprint methodology, version 3.0. To compare the primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging, the results of the climate change indicator were used as a base to calculate the Package-to-Product (PtP) indicator. Among the considered scenarios to handle the waste packaging (landfilling scenario, material recovery scenario, energy recovery scenario, and the mixed scenario), the material recovery scenario is the most preferable and, for most of the packaging materials, the scenario with the lowest impact. Following the PtP result, the secondary packaging in the roof tile system has a significant share of the impact of the whole system (16% for the energy recovery scenario). Moreover, the results confirm the PtP indicator as the appropriate indicator to analyse the environmental impacts of construction products.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz ;
Idris, Juferi ;
Yusoff, Sumiani .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
[2]   Environmental Impacts of Reusable Transport Items: A Case Study of Pallet Pooling in a Retailer Supply Chain [J].
Accorsi, Riccardo ;
Baruffaldi, Giulia ;
Manzini, Riccardo ;
Pini, Chiara .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (11)
[3]   Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Traditional Clay Bricks Mixed with Organic Waste Using Life Cycle Analysis [J].
Adolfo Lozano-Miralles, Jose ;
Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, Manuel ;
Martinez-Garcia, Carmen ;
Rojas-Sola, Jose Ignacio .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 158042012A22019 CEN
[5]   Characterizing the Carbon Footprint of Wood Pallet Logistics [J].
Carrano, Andres L. ;
Thorn, Brian K. ;
Woltag, Henry .
FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2014, 64 (7-8) :232-241
[6]   Regenerative design, socio-ecological systems and co-evolution [J].
Cole, Raymond J. ;
Oliver, Amy ;
Robinson, John .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (02) :237-247
[7]  
Fazio S., SUPPORTING INFORM CH
[8]   Building a Sustainability Benchmarking Framework of Ceramic Tiles Based on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) [J].
Ferrari, Anna Maria ;
Volpi, Lucrezia ;
Pini, Martina ;
Siligardi, Cristina ;
Enrique Garcia-Muina, Fernando ;
Settembre-Blundo, Davide .
RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (01)
[9]   Life cycle assessment comparison among different reuse intensities for industrial wooden containers [J].
Gasol, Carles M. ;
Farreny, Ramon ;
Gabarrell, Xavier ;
Rieradevall, Joan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (05) :421-431
[10]   Production patterns of packaging waste categories generated at typical Mediterranean residential building worksites [J].
Gonzalez Pericot, N. ;
Villoria Saez, P. ;
Del Rio Merino, M. ;
Liebana Carrasco, O. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (11) :1932-1938