Risk factors associated with bleeding after multi antithrombotic therapy during implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices

被引:4
|
作者
Ishibashi, Kohei [1 ,3 ]
Miyamoto, Koji [1 ]
Kamakura, Tsukasa [1 ]
Wada, Mitsuru [1 ]
Nakajima, Ikutaro [1 ]
Inoue, Yuko [1 ]
Okamura, Hideo [1 ]
Noda, Takashi [1 ]
Aiba, Takeshi [1 ]
Kamakura, Shiro [1 ]
Shimizu, Wataru [2 ]
Yasuda, Satoshi [1 ]
Akasaka, Takashi [3 ]
Kusano, Kengo [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 5-7-1 Fujishiro Dai, Suita, Osaka 5658565, Japan
[2] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Wakayama Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Wakayama, Japan
关键词
Cardiac surgery; Electrophysiology; Implanted cardiac defibrillators; Pacemakers; NONVALVULAR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ORALLY ANTICOAGULATED PATIENTS; RHYTHM SOCIETY APHRS; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PREDICTING STROKE; WARFARIN THERAPY; PACEMAKER; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00380-016-0879-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Previous studies showed that continuous anticoagulation or single antiplatelet therapy during implantations of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) was relatively safe. However, the safety of continuous multi antithrombotic therapy (AT) in patients undergoing CIED interventions has not been clearly defined. We sought to evaluate the safety of this therapy during CIED implantations. A total of 300 consecutive patients (mean 69 years old, 171 males) with CIED implantations were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 6 groups [No-AT, oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), OAT and SAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), triple AT (TAT)], and the perioperative complications were evaluated. Clinically significant pocket hematomas (PH) were defined as PH needing surgical intervention, prolonged hospitalizations, interruption of AT, or blood product transfusions. There were 129, 89, 49, 20, 10, and 3 patients in No-AT, OAT, SAPT, OAT + SAPT, DAPT, and TAT groups, respectively. The occurrence of clinically significant PH and thromboembolism did not differ among 6 groups (p = 0.145 and p = 0.795, respectively). However, high HAS-BLED score and valvular heart disease (VHD) were associated with clinically significant PH (p = 0.014 and p = 0.015, respectively). Continuous multi AT may be tolerated, but patients with high HAS-BLED score or VHD would require a careful attention during CIED implantations.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors associated with bleeding after multi antithrombotic therapy during implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Kohei Ishibashi
    Koji Miyamoto
    Tsukasa Kamakura
    Mitsuru Wada
    Ikutaro Nakajima
    Yuko Inoue
    Hideo Okamura
    Takashi Noda
    Takeshi Aiba
    Shiro Kamakura
    Wataru Shimizu
    Satoshi Yasuda
    Takashi Akasaka
    Kengo Kusano
    Heart and Vessels, 2017, 32 : 333 - 340
  • [2] The management of the antithrombotic therapy in the patient candidate for implantation or replacement of implantable cardiac electronic devices
    Zaca, Valerio
    Marcucci, Rossella
    Parodi, Guido
    Limbruno, Ugo
    Notarstefano, Pasquale
    Pieragnoli, Paolo
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Casolo, Giancarlo
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2014, 15 (01) : 56 - 72
  • [3] PREVALENCE, MECHANISMS AND RISK FACTORS OF LEAD MACRODISLODGEMENT AFTER IMPLANTATION OF CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Tseng, Andrew
    Shipman, Justin
    Lee, Justin
    Mi, Lanyu
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Srivathsan, Komandoor
    Shen, Win-Kuang
    Amin, Mustapha
    Osborn, Michael
    Asirvatham, Samuel
    Friedman, Paul
    Mulpuru, Siva
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 354 - 354
  • [4] Bleeding complications after implantation of active cardiovascular implantable devices in an era of triple therapy and novel antithrombotic drugs
    Heimbaecher, L.
    Senel, G.
    Sandrock, S.
    Demming, T.
    Bonnemeier, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 660 - 660
  • [5] Incidence of Bleeding-Related Complications During Primary Implantation and Replacement of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Nichols, Christine I.
    Vose, Joshua G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (01):
  • [6] Risk factors associated with clinically relevant pericardial effusion after primary cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
    Zhou, Yangzhi
    Haxha, Saranda
    Halili, Andrim
    Philbert, Berit T.
    Nielsen, Olav W.
    Sajadieh, Ahmad
    Koeber, Lars
    Gislason, Gunnar H.
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Bang, Casper N.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (12)
  • [7] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Implantation After Cardiac Surgery: Occurrence, Risk Factors and Survival Outcomes
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    Cantillon, Daniel J.
    Rickard, John
    Houghtaling, Penny
    Wazni, Oussama
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Sabik, Joseph F.
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S533 - S534
  • [8] Ultrasound utilization for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Muhtashim Mian
    Habib Rehman Khan
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2023, 135 : 712 - 718
  • [9] Ultrasound utilization for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Mian, Muhtashim
    Khan, Habib Rehman
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2023, 135 (23-24) : 712 - 718
  • [10] Perioperative management of antithrombotic treatment during implantation or revision of cardiac implantable electronic devices: the European Snapshot Survey on Procedural Routines for Electronic Device Implantation (ESS-PREDI)
    Deharo, Jean-Claude
    Sciaraffia, Elena
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Amara, Walid
    Doering, Michael
    Bongiorni, Maria G.
    Chen, Jian
    Dagres, Nicolaus
    Estner, Heidi
    Larsen, Torben B.
    Johansen, Jens B.
    Potpara, Tatjana S.
    Proclemer, Alessandro
    Pison, Laurent
    Brunet, Caroline
    Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (05): : 778 - 784