Risk for complications in the subsequent pregnancy following first versus second-stage cesarean delivery: 25 years follow-up in a large cohort

被引:2
作者
Bitensky, Shira [1 ]
Pariente, Gali [2 ]
Rotem, Reut [3 ]
Sergienko, Ruslan [4 ]
Weintraub, Adi Yehuda [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Joyce & Irving Goldman Med Sch, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Soroka Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Sch Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Soroka Univ, Adv Data Management & Stat Programming Serv Acad, Fac Hlth Sci,Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
First stage of labor; cesarean delivery; non-progressive labor; second stage of labor; trial of labor after cesarean; GRAPHIC ANALYSIS; LABOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2020.1852211
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Cesarean delivery is a prevalent procedure worldwide, and an established risk factor for subsequent pregnancies. Aims: To examine if a prior cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor carries different risk profiles for adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study, based on data accumulated over the years 1988-2013 at the Soroka University Medical Center. We compared pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes in subsequent delivery following a cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed. Results: There were 3828 subsequent deliveries of patients who underwent prior cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, 2791 (72.91%) and 1037 (27.09%), respectively. Patients with a prior cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor were more likely to have hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (7.4% vs 3.8% in first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p = .002), and repeated cesarean delivery at the subsequent pregnancy (70% vs 62% in first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p < .001). Patients with prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor were more likely to have preterm birth (10% vs 6.8% in second vs. first stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p = .001). Prior cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor was independently associated with a recurrent cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. In addition, prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor was independently associated with preterm birth. Conclusions: Cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor carries higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and recurrent cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor carries higher rates of subsequent preterm birth.
引用
收藏
页码:4485 / 4490
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Howell KR, 2017, REPRODUCTION, V153, pR97, DOI [10.1530/REP-16-0495, 10.1530/rep-16-0495]
  • [12] Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset
    Kjaergaard, Hanne
    Olsen, Jorn
    Ottesen, Bent
    Dykes, Anna-Karin
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (04) : 402 - 407
  • [13] Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    Athanasiou, Antonios
    Paraskevaidi, Maria
    Mitra, Anita
    Kalliala, Ilkka
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
    Arbyn, Marc
    Bennett, Phillip
    Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [14] Second-stage labor: how long is too long?
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Nelson, David B.
    McIntire, Donald D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) : 484 - 489
  • [15] Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth?
    Levine, Lisa D.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Hirshberg, Adi
    Elovitz, Michal A.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 360.e1 - 360.e7
  • [16] Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success
    Lewkowitz, Adam Korrick
    Nakagawa, Sanae
    Thiet, Mari-Paule
    Rosenstein, Melissa Greer
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) : 861.e1 - 861.e5
  • [17] Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation
    Lurie, Samuel
    Raz, Nili
    Boaz, Mona
    Sadan, Oscar
    Golan, Abraham
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 182 : 43 - 47
  • [18] Cervical hyaluronan biology in pregnancy, parturition and preterm birth
    Mahendroo, Mala
    [J]. MATRIX BIOLOGY, 2019, 78-79 : 24 - 31
  • [19] OECD, 2017, CAESAREAN SECTION RA
  • [20] Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section
    Pomorski, Michal
    Fuchs, Tomasz
    Rosner-Tenerowicz, Anna
    Zimmer, Mariusz
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 88 (04) : 174 - 179