Risk for complications in the subsequent pregnancy following first versus second-stage cesarean delivery: 25 years follow-up in a large cohort

被引:2
作者
Bitensky, Shira [1 ]
Pariente, Gali [2 ]
Rotem, Reut [3 ]
Sergienko, Ruslan [4 ]
Weintraub, Adi Yehuda [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Joyce & Irving Goldman Med Sch, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Soroka Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Sch Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Soroka Univ, Adv Data Management & Stat Programming Serv Acad, Fac Hlth Sci,Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
First stage of labor; cesarean delivery; non-progressive labor; second stage of labor; trial of labor after cesarean; GRAPHIC ANALYSIS; LABOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2020.1852211
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Cesarean delivery is a prevalent procedure worldwide, and an established risk factor for subsequent pregnancies. Aims: To examine if a prior cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor carries different risk profiles for adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study, based on data accumulated over the years 1988-2013 at the Soroka University Medical Center. We compared pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes in subsequent delivery following a cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed. Results: There were 3828 subsequent deliveries of patients who underwent prior cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, 2791 (72.91%) and 1037 (27.09%), respectively. Patients with a prior cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor were more likely to have hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (7.4% vs 3.8% in first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p = .002), and repeated cesarean delivery at the subsequent pregnancy (70% vs 62% in first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p < .001). Patients with prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor were more likely to have preterm birth (10% vs 6.8% in second vs. first stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p = .001). Prior cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor was independently associated with a recurrent cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. In addition, prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor was independently associated with preterm birth. Conclusions: Cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor carries higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and recurrent cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor carries higher rates of subsequent preterm birth.
引用
收藏
页码:4485 / 4490
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia - effect on subsequent trial of labor
    Abildgaard, Helle
    Ingerslev, Marie Diness
    Nickelsen, Carsten
    Secher, Niels Joergen
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [2] Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor
    Alexander, James M.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Landon, Mark B.
    Gilbert, Sharon
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Moawad, Atef H.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Gabbe, Steven G.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04) : 917 - 921
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Obstet Gynecol, V123, P1398, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000450758.95422.c8
  • [4] Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies
    Bartsch, Emily
    Medcalf, Karyn E.
    Park, Alison L.
    Ray, Joel G.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
  • [5] Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    Levine, Lisa D.
    Vink, Joy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [6] Risk factors for recurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a population-based cohort study
    Ebbing, Cathrine
    Rasmussen, Svein
    Skjaerven, Rolv
    Irgens, Lorentz M.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 96 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [7] The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth
    Frey, Heather A.
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 21 (02) : 68 - 73
  • [8] GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF LABOR
    FRIEDMAN, EA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1978, 132 (07) : 822 - 823
  • [9] FRIEDMAN EA, 1978, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V132, P824, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(78)80018-0
  • [10] Grobman SG., 2016, OBSTET NORMAL PROBLE