The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor

被引:87
作者
Lacassie, HJ
Columb, MO
Lacassie, HP
Lantadilla, RA
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Anesthesiol, Santiago, Chile
[2] S Manchester Univ Hosp, Withington, England
[3] Clin Alemana, Anesthesiol Serv, Santiago, Chile
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200207000-00036
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Minimal local analgesic concentrations (MLAC) have been used to determine the epidural analgesic potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. There are no reports of the motor blocking potencies of these drugs. We sought to determine the motor block MLAC of both drugs and their relative potency ratio. Sixty ASA physical status I and II parturients, were randomized to one of two groups, during the first stage of labor. Each received a 20-mL bolus of epidural bupivacaine or ropivacaine. The first woman in each group received 0.35%. Up-down sequential allocation was used to determine subsequent concentrations at a testing interval of 0.025%. Effective motor block was defined as a Bromage score <4 within 30 min. The up-down sequences were analyzed by using the Dixon and Massey method and probit regression to quantify the motor block minimal local analgesic concentration. Two-sided P < 0.05 defined significance. The motor block minimal local analgesic concentration for bupivacaine was 0.326% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.285-0.367) and for ropivacaine was 0.497% (95% CL 0.431-0.563) (P = 0.0008). The ropivacaine/bupivacaine potency ratio was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.52-0.82). This is the first MLAC study to estimate the motor blocking potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Ropivacaine was significantly less potent for motor block, at 66% that of bupivacaine.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 208
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] BREEN TW, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P919
  • [2] Bromage PR., 1978, EPIDURAL ANALGESIA, P144
  • [3] Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour
    Capogna, G
    Celleno, D
    Lyons, G
    Columb, M
    Fusco, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [4] Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour
    Capogna, G
    Celleno, D
    Fusco, P
    Lyons, G
    Columb, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) : 371 - 373
  • [5] Columb MO, 2000, REGIONAL ANALGESIA IN OBSTETRICS, P157
  • [6] DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM LOCAL ANALGESIC CONCENTRATIONS OF EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE AND LIDOCAINE IN LABOR
    COLUMB, MO
    LYONS, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) : 833 - 837
  • [7] Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine?
    D'Angelo, R
    James, RL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) : 941 - 943
  • [8] Dixon WJ, 1983, INTRO STAT ANAL, V4th, P426
  • [9] FELDMAN HS, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V69, P794
  • [10] LACASSIE HJ, 2000, REV CHIL ANESTESIA, V29, P5