Advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma

被引:76
作者
Mandrioli, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Inaba, Kenji [3 ]
Piccinini, Alice [1 ,2 ]
Biscardi, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Sartelli, Massimo [4 ]
Agresta, Ferdinando [5 ]
Catena, Fausto [6 ]
Cirocchi, Roberto [7 ,8 ]
Jovine, Elio [1 ,2 ]
Tugnoli, Gregorio [1 ,2 ]
Di Saverio, Salomone [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CA Pizzardi Maggiore Hosp, Ctr Trauma, Dept Emergency & Gen Surg, I-40133 Bologna, Italy
[2] CA Pizzardi Maggiore Hosp, Ctr Trauma, Trauma Surg Unit, I-40133 Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ So Calif, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Surg & Surg Crit Care, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[4] Macerata Hosp, Dept Surg, I-62100 Macerata, Italy
[5] Adria Hosp, Dept Surg, I-45011 Rovigo, Italy
[6] Maggiore Hosp, Dept Emergency & Trauma Surg, I-43126 Parma, Italy
[7] St Maria Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, I-05100 Perugia, Italy
[8] St Maria Hosp, Liver Unit, I-05100 Perugia, Italy
关键词
Laparoscopy; Acute care surgery; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Trauma; SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PERFORATED PEPTIC-ULCER; BILE-DUCT INJURIES; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; ABDOMINAL GUNSHOT WOUNDS; BLUNT HEPATIC-TRAUMA; OPEN APPENDECTOMY; SINGLE-INCISION; NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.668
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The greatest advantages of laparoscopy when compared to open surgery include the faster recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased postoperative pain, earlier return to work and resumption of normal daily activity as well as cosmetic benefits. Laparoscopy today is considered the gold standard of care in the treatment of cholecystitis and appendicitis worldwide. Laparoscopy has even been adopted in colorectal surgery with good results. The technological improvements in this surgical field along with the development of modern techniques and the acquisition of specific laparoscopic skills have allowed for its utilization in operations with fully intracorporeal anastomoses. Further progress in laparoscopy has included single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice trans-luminal endoscopic surgery. Nevertheless, laparoscopy for emergency surgery is still considered challenging and is usually not recommended due to the lack of adequate experience in this area. The technical difficulties of operating in the presence of diffuse peritonitis or large purulent collections and diffuse adhesions are also given as reasons. However, the potential advantages of laparoscopy, both in terms of diagnosis and therapy, are clear. Major advantages may be observed in cases with diffuse peritonitis secondary to perforated peptic ulcers, for example, where laparoscopy allows the confirmation of the diagnosis, the identification of the position of the ulcer and a laparoscopic repair with effective peritoneal washout. Laparoscopy has also revolutionized the approach to complicated diverticulitis even when intestinal perforation is present. Many other emergency conditions can be effectively managed laparoscopically, including trauma in select hemodynamically-stable patients. We have therefore reviewed the most recent scientific literature on advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma in order to demonstrate the current indications and outcomes associated with a laparoscopic approach to the treatment of the most common emergency surgical conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 680
页数:13
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called "golden 72 hours"? Or better "golden 24 hours" and "silver 25-72 hour"? A case control study
    Ambe, Peter
    Weber, Sebastian A.
    Christ, Hildegard
    Wassenberg, Dirk
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2014, 9
  • [2] Andersen JC, 2012, DAN MED J, V59
  • [3] Guidelines of Diagnostics and Treatment of Acute Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis
    Andeweg, Caroline S.
    Mulder, Irene M.
    Felt-Bersma, Richelle J. F.
    Verbon, Annelies
    van der Wilt, Gert Jan
    van Goor, Harry
    Lange, Johan F.
    Stoker, Jaap
    Boermeester, Marja A.
    Bleichrodt, Robert P.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 30 (4-6) : 278 - 292
  • [4] Bailey IS, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P84
  • [5] Trends in Peptic Ulcer Disease and the Identification of Helicobacter Pylori as a Causative Organism: Population-based Estimates from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample
    Bashinskaya, Bronislava
    Nahed, Brian V.
    Redjal, Navid
    Kahle, Kristopher T.
    Walcott, Brian P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 3 (04) : 366 - 370
  • [6] Bastug D F, 1991, Surg Laparosc Endosc, V1, P259
  • [7] Choice of approach for appendicectomy: A meta-analysis of open versus Laparoscopic appendicectomy
    Bennett, John
    Boddy, Alex
    Rhodes, Michael
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (04) : 245 - 255
  • [8] Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature
    Bertleff, Marietta J. O. E.
    Lange, Johan F.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (06): : 1231 - 1239
  • [9] Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Soreide, Kjetil
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    Assarsson, Jeanette Hansson
    Drake, Frederick Thurston
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 (10000) : 1278 - 1287
  • [10] Incisions do not simply sum
    Blinman, Thane
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (07): : 1746 - 1751