The effect of interstimulus intervals and between-block rests on the auditory evoked potential and magnetic field: is the auditory P50 in humans an overlapping potential?

被引:40
作者
Onitsuka, T
Ninomiya, H
Sato, E
Yamamoto, T
Tashiro, N
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
auditory evoked potentials; auditory evoked magnetic fields; P50; P50m; middle latency auditory evoked response;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00241-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The human auditory P50 may consist of overlapping potentials. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and between-block rests, and recorded the P50, P50m, N100 and the N100m simultaneously. Methods: Subjects were 12 right-handed healthy adults. Four conditions included: (1) 1.5 s/rest, (2) 1.5 s/successive, (3) 0.5 s/rest, and (4) 0.5 s/successive. Auditory stimuli were presented a total of 880 times for each condition. Auditory evoked potentials and magnetic fields were recorded. We examined the P50, N100, P50m, N100m and dipoles of the P50m and the N100m. Results: There was no significant effect of the ISI on the P50 amplitudes, but the P50m amplitudes in the 0.5 s IST conditions were significantly smaller than those in the 1.5 s ISI conditions. The N100 and the N100m amplitudes in the 0.5 s ISI conditions were significantly smaller than those in the 1.5 s ISI conditions. The N100 and the N100m amplitudes in the resting conditions were significantly larger than those in the successive conditions. The P50m dipoles were slightly deeper and more anterior than those of the N100m in primary auditory cortex. Conclusions: Central structures other than supratemporal cortex contribute to the P50 and that the P50 in humans represents overlapping potentials. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
HARI R, 1982, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V54, P561, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90041-4
[12]  
Jacobson GP, 1997, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V53, P46
[13]   P50 SUPPRESSION IS NOT AFFECTED BY ATTENTIONAL MANIPULATIONS [J].
JERGER, K ;
BIGGINS, C ;
FEIN, G .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 31 (04) :365-377
[14]  
JUDD LL, 1992, AM J PSYCHIAT, V149, P488
[15]   RETICULAR-FORMATION INFLUENCES ON PRIMARY AND NONPRIMARY AUDITORY PATHWAYS AS REFLECTED BY THE MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSE [J].
KRAUS, N ;
MCGEE, T ;
LITTMAN, T ;
NICOL, T .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1992, 587 (02) :186-194
[16]   RECORDING OF AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN MAN USING CHRONIC SUBDURAL ELECTRODES [J].
LEE, YS ;
LUEDERS, H ;
DINNER, DS ;
LESSER, RP ;
HAHN, J ;
KLEM, G .
BRAIN, 1984, 107 (MAR) :115-131
[17]  
LIGEOISCHAUVEL C, 1994, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V92, P204
[18]   WHOLE-HEAD MAPPING OF MIDDLE-LATENCY AUDITORY-EVOKED MAGNETIC-FIELDS [J].
MAKELA, JP ;
HAMALAINEN, M ;
HARI, R ;
MCEVOY, L .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (05) :414-421
[19]  
MCFARLAND WH, 1975, AUDIOLOGY, V14, P456
[20]   GATING OF AUDITORY RESPONSE IN SCHIZOPHRENICS AND NORMAL CONTROLS - EFFECTS OF RECORDING SITE AND STIMULATION INTERVAL ON THE P50 WAVE [J].
NAGAMOTO, HT ;
ADLER, LE ;
WALDO, MC ;
GRIFFITH, J ;
FREEDMAN, R .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1991, 4 (01) :31-40