Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe

被引:26
作者
Balazsi, Agnes [1 ]
Danhardt, Juliana [2 ]
Collins, Sue [3 ]
Schweiger, Oliver [4 ]
Settele, Josef [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hartel, Tibor [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Sapientia Hungarian Univ Transylvania, Dept Environm Sci, Ecosyst Serv Lab, Calea Turzii 4, Cluj Napoca 400193, Romania
[2] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res, Solvegatan 37, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[3] Butterfly Conservat Europe, POB 506, NL-6700 Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Community Ecol, Halle, Saale, Germany
[5] IDiv German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res, Leipzig, Germany
[6] Univ Philippines, Coll Arts & Sci, Inst Biol Sci, Laguna, Philippines
[7] Babes Bolyai Univ, Hungarian Dept Biol & Ecol, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[8] Babes Bolyai Univ, Ctr Syst Biol Biodivers & Bioresources Ctr 3B, Cluj Napoca, Romania
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Social-ecological systems; Landscape planning and management; Inter- and transdisciplinary; Policy; Expert; WOOD-PASTURES; LAND-USE; LANDSCAPE; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION; KNOWLEDGE; HERITAGE; POLICY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104900
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The CES subcategories cover a wide range of domains (e.g. recreation, conservation of cultural heritage, human-nature relations). The CES concept has been proposed to acknowledge the nonmaterial values linking people and nature in social-ecological systems. Agricultural landscapes are outstanding examples of complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine the CES values. Europe is still rich in such landscapes/systems with outstanding cultural and natural values that deliver a multitude of CES. In this paper, we address the knowledge and perceptions of identified experts on the role of CES in the management of European agricultural landscapes. To achieve this goal, we developed a questionnaire on CES which was answered by experts working with various issues of European agricultural landscapes, including sustainable agriculture, landscape ecology, grassland management, nature conservation, cultural heritage conservation, environmental policy, sustainability research and rural development. The results show a wide knowledge and acceptance of the CES concept within such expert communities. Especially the aesthetic, cultural heritage, educational and recreational values were considered the most relevant CES subcategories. Interdisciplinary approaches, landscape planning and integrative science-policy approaches were perceived as the most promising methodologies to improve the CES approach for policy and management. Our results also show that according to experts the CES concept is still far from practical implementation in policies that target agricultural landscapes. In order to sustain such systems, we suggest the better implementation of inter- and transdisciplinary research for the development of CES-integrative policy and decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Navigating pluralism: Understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept [J].
Ainscough, Jacob ;
Lentsch, Aster de Vries ;
Metzger, Marc ;
Rounsevell, Mark ;
Schroeter, Matthias ;
Delbaere, Ben ;
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Staes, Jan .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 36
[2]   Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries [J].
Allen, Cameron ;
Metternicht, Graciela ;
Wiedmann, Thomas .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (05) :1453-1467
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis
[4]   Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Perez-Rincon, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2018, 27 (01) :29-53
[5]   Beautiful agricultural landscapes promote cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation [J].
Assandri, Giacomo ;
Bogliani, Giuseppe ;
Pedrini, Paolo ;
Brambilla, Mattia .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 256 :200-210
[6]   Do conservation and agri-environmental regulations effectively support traditional small-scale farming in East-Central European cultural landscapes? [J].
Babai, Daniel ;
Toth, Antonia ;
Szentirmai, Istvan ;
Biro, Marianna ;
Mate, Andras ;
Demeter, Laszlo ;
Szepligeti, Matyas ;
Varga, Anna ;
Molnar, Abel ;
Kun, Robert ;
Molnar, Zsolt .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2015, 24 (13) :3305-3327
[7]   Small-scale traditional management of highly species-rich grasslands in the Carpathians [J].
Babai, Daniel ;
Molnar, Zsolt .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 182 :123-130
[8]   The impacts of social-ecological system change on human-nature connectedness: A case study from Transylvania, Romania [J].
Balazsi, Agnes ;
Riechers, Maraja ;
Hartel, Tibor ;
Leventon, Julia ;
Fischer, Joern .
LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 89
[9]  
Banyai O., 2018, LOCAL ENV PROBLEMS A, P15
[10]   Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Cramer, Wolfgang ;
Begossi, Alpina ;
Cundill, Georgina ;
Diaz, Sandra ;
Egoh, Benis N. ;
Geijzendorffer, Ilse R. ;
Krug, Cornelia B. ;
Lavorel, Sandra ;
Lazos, Elena ;
Lebel, Louis ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Meyfroidt, Patrick ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Nel, Jeanne L. ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Payet, Karine ;
Perez Harguindeguy, Natalia ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Prieur-Richard, Anne-Hele Ne ;
Reyers, Belinda ;
Roebeling, Peter ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Solan, Martin ;
Tschakert, Petra ;
Tscharntke, Teja ;
Turner, B. L., II ;
Verburg, Peter H. ;
Viglizzo, Ernesto F. ;
White, Piran C. L. ;
Woodward, Guy .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 14 :76-85