Uncertainty of the Air Gauge Test Rig

被引:12
作者
Jermak, Czeslaw Janusz [1 ]
Jakubowicz, Michal [1 ]
Derezynski, Janusz [1 ]
Rucki, Miroslaw [2 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Mech Technol, Div Metrol & Measurement Syst, Piotrowo 3, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
[2] Kazimierz Pulaski Univ Technol & Humanities Radom, Fac Mech Engn, 54 Krasickiego Str, PL-26600 Radom, Poland
关键词
Air gauging; Precision; Measurement; Uncertainty; Data processing; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12541-017-0058-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the paper, the Advanced Back Pressure Experimental Rig is described and its measurement uncertainty is estimated. The test rig consists of mechanical, pneumatic and electronic systems, which are the main sources of uncertainty. Moreover, operator, environment, A/D conversion and data processing take part in the uncertainty propagation. To perform the uncertainty analysis, mutual impact of the system parts was considered, and the main stages of the data collection and processing were distinguished: setting of the assumed point, reading of its value, reading of the corresponding back-pressure, and the calculation of the examined air gauge characteristics. The analysis confirmed the uncertainty propagation with the largest uncertainty added by the approximation algorithms in the final stage of the process. The equipment variation was evaluated, too, and its value was found satisfactory, especially as it included the repeatability of the tested air gauge itself.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 485
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[2]   Pneumatic gauge steady-state modelling by theoretical and empirical methods [J].
Bokov, Vladimir B. .
MEASUREMENT, 2011, 44 (02) :303-311
[3]   Foundations for system measurement [J].
Bullock, R. ;
Deckro, R. .
MEASUREMENT, 2006, 39 (08) :701-709
[4]  
Burrows V.R., 1976, FOUND WELD PROD ENG, V10, P31
[5]   Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty of perspiration measurement systems [J].
Chen, Andrew ;
Chen, Chiachung .
MEASUREMENT, 2016, 87 :27-37
[6]  
Derezynski J., 2016, MECHANIK, V89, P196
[7]  
Dietrich E, 2010, STAT PROCEDURES MACH
[8]  
Domanska A., 2011, MEASUREMENT UNCERTAI, P22
[9]   Quantifying impacts on the measurement uncertainty in flow calibration arising from dynamic flow effects [J].
Engel, Rainer ;
Baade, Hans-Joachim .
FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2015, 44 :51-60
[10]   Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces [J].
Grandy, D. ;
Koshy, P. ;
Klocke, F. .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 58 (01) :515-518